Well, except that Taylor Swift is a super-rich celebrity beloved by white supremacists, so she personally comes out of a Trump presidency just fine (assuming, y’know, we avoid the total annihilation of humanity). Your friend is deluded, but a Trump-voting Taylor is just crudely selfish.

If what you’ve worked decades (uh, as a twenty-something...) for can be endangered by denouncing a bigoted rapist attempting to wreck the country, then maybe what you’ve worked for is bullshit.

A fair number of them justify it by being white supremacists!

“It’s her right” in the same way it’s the right of the Trump administration to starve the elderly poor and deprive millions of health insurance. Sure, it’s legal! There’s nothing we can do to stop them! They’re absolutely irredeemable garbage creatures for it!

No one needed to encourage Donald Trump to talk about politics and he wouldn’t have listened to anyone trying to dissuade him.

I mean, he’s mostly the same as other Republicans. The massive military buildup and destruction of the State Department are Trump oddities, but the rest of the budget is basically mainstream Republican priorities. They were already far away from human decency.

That’s how it shows up — the first line is even with the margins — on my 1024x600 netbook, 2560x1440 desktop, and godknowsxsomething old-ass tablet, so I assumed it was hard-formatted. It might just be a weird coincidence, I guess?

Two rows of text.

“321wordpass”

On the other hand, Trump won NC handily while anti-trans poster boy Pat McCrory was shown the door and is now a pariah. I think (hope) it’s a little like gay marriage was a few years ago: the right is making a push to legislate their bigotry because they’re starting to see society turning against them.

Jezebel’s also a place where people talk/vent about women’s issues, so it might make sense to provide a comment section for talking/venting about this. I don’t know if that’s a sufficient justification, but it doesn’t seem obviously illegitimate.

It appears, based on the comments, that about 60% of Gizmodo’s audience exclusively hate-read and hate-comment there, often many times on every article, because the site is worthless leftist trash. Fuckin’ nerd-nazis, man.

I think the actual, silly answer is that the headline as-is exactly fills two rows.

David Stern’s dress code was pretty nakedly racist, but down the road it led to NBA players becoming style icons Russell Westbrook’s outfits so I can kinda forgive him from a purely consequentialist perspective. Related to that, I agree that one of the most fun things for a fan is the degree of self-expression players…

You might be right; I honestly have trouble assuming good faith with people who want to debate this. That there are 900+ comments on this article suggests it isn’t just drive-by shitslingers, which is extra depressing.

I’m just cheering for injuries.

You patience and persistence in these comments is really impressive.

The problem is that she shifts between comparing trans women to “women born women” and comparing trans women to women. The former, although the phrasing makes me a little itchy, is a totally true and obvious point. The latter, though, is absolutely denying trans women their womanhood: they’re explicitly being…

Many transgender people only experienced adversity once they decided to become women