I am not arguing. I am just saying that just by having flash installed you are using more battery than without it since most websites prefer using it over HTML5 Video etc. My point is basically that flash is a resource hog.

double post

From Lifehacker:

The point is, having flash means that websites will use it instead of HTML5 or something. Some websites even display flash advertisements. Therefore, having flash will automatically mean that you will use it and using flash requires more resources.

If there is no source it means Gizmodo bought a pay as you go AT&T iPhone 4S and saw that it was unlocked.

[sites.google.com]

You don't

On the Samsung Galaxy phones, the Samsung task killer actually shows you if a program is using CPU cycles and highlights them in red if they are runaway processes. I find this useful when the occasional game gets stuck and I need to kill it. It also has a clear RAM button, but I have never found myself using that.…

I can imagine Morgan Freeman reading this.

This one? [www.gimp.org]

Google's definition of real: [lmgtfy.com]

I'm sorry but I have never read the bible and do not accept it as the truth, along with 4.775 billion other people. [1][2]

This facepalm is directed to my original comment

Turn it off and it becomes a black pixel.

There are 3 in central London. Probably more in the boroughs.

It's not working.

Isn't it always?* At least it isn't as unpredictable as it is here in London.

So what does "KRAFTEDENME" mean?

From google translate (assuming you are swedish):

They also made it unnecessarily long for windows. All you have to do in windows is drag each app into the startup folder in the start menu. Most good apps remmember their window position.