Please, tell us more about how you spare the animals your digestive tract o merciful one!

That is the realization of the big nightmare for most of us. I’m not sure what manner of projectile launcher would be available to the owner, but you can bet he's using it in the “what if” running through his head...

In your warranted criticism, you are guilty of the very thing you criticize. I fail to see how hypocrisy takes the high ground to “butt hurt.”

I thought that this ideology was supposedly based on the word of God. If that isn’t holy, then what about God is? What merit does any of it have? What is to define “God?” Oh how I enjoy theological gymnastics.

Oh to come up with zingers like you gotta get laid, bro. Mere acknowledgement is affirming.

This is browser, not memo pad. Get your apps straight, man!

Not to sound like a jerk, but I’d probably start with a source of info that isn’t the Qatari royal ‘news’ agency. Their reputation suggests they have more of a hard-on for undermining U.S. policy than honestly reporting on it, because when they throw a fit about the human trafficking and sexism and hostility and…

The Arab region. Where these terms are usually synonyms!

4 lug wheels? ;)

k

Please tell me this E90post crap isn’t going to surface on here...

Please substantiate that claim or stop giving them shit they don’t deserve.

I also just hate seeing old cars destroyed. Totally takes me out of the scene when that happens!

I understand that, and made it clear that I was referring to the pre-F150 variant... variant. The 6.2 V8 debuted in 2010.

I’m talking about the earlier EcoBoost that came out around the same time, though. The improved F-150 version peaks 700 RPM lower, but then we’re talking about an evolved version of the Boss V8's contemporary. You’re 100% correct in the stats. I was just talking about 2010's 3.5 vs 2010's 6.2.

I was referring to the 3.5 EcoBoost that was the Boss V8's contemporary (which is why I added “during the same time”), which made peak power at 5,700 RPM. That would make the EcoBoost more of a rev-happy engine by the numbers, after all.

“High revving? Clearly you don’t understand turbo engines...”

I then presented a counterargument to that point, which seems to have been misunderstood as me saying the EcoBoost V6 has a high redline or that it revs high.

I understand that, and I'm not either...

You implied not that the 3.5 doesn’t rev high, but that turbocharged engines do not rev high. It depends on the engine and the turbocharger. You could short shift your SHO if it had (by some magic) the 6.2 Boss as well. Neither are really rev-happy, but that doesn’t mean it’s a rule for NA or FI engines.

Clearly neither of you do...