Just a reminder that Caitlyn Jenner has killed the same amount of people as Darren Wilson.

I’m sorry, but Taylor, who writes her own music, doesn’t possess “less artistry” than Beyonce. And you can say that Taylor is calculated to appear “quirky” and “so silly” but why is that somehow worse than Beyonce being calculated to appear as “fierce” or “boss bitch” or whatever? They are both complete industry…

What’s the deal with him flashing orange, like he’s some 90’s arcade boss whose health is low? Is that a thing in Street Fighter?

It seems like more and more Gawker/Jez are posting “haha look at this stupid fucking celebrity having an opinion about something, what a stupid fucking piece of shit for thinking their opinion matters” articles. You know, unlike the great wisdom we should glean from the opinions of spoiled millenial bloggers.

Yeah, this really reeks of a failed burn attempt on a “dumb celebrity.”

I never said I was neutral, friend. I specifically mention “the side I’m on.” Maybe you should step the fuck back and just pay attention for a while before trying again.

Yes, it does.

Oh fuck off. I’m against sloppy logic and rhetoric, especially when it comes from the side I’m on. (Your post, by the way, is another ad hominem attack.)

The problem isn’t that Caitlyn isn’t saying anything. The problem is that the media that fawns over her every move tends to have gotten over this little bump in the road rather quickly. If someone who Gawker didn’t like (Donald Trump, Bill Cosby, Hulk Hogan, etc.) had killed someone, don’t you think they’d gleefully…

If Donald Trump had killed someone, that fact would be featured in literally every Gawker/Jezebel post about him. So while it’s unfortunate that Caitlyn’s latest struggle is what bathing suit to wear, Kimberly Howe’s latest struggle is being dead.

holy shit do you just keep playing it over and over again? go you for getting your money’s worth!

Oddly, according to the article, the post actually says “his daughter is a N—-!” What a bizarrely self-censoring racist.

This is all good, but the The New York Times has its own internal style guidelines, and does not follow AP/Chicago/anyone else. You can purchase it here: http://www.amazon.com/York-Times-Man…

That’s actually tricky, because often doctors don’t get called Dr. outside of a medical/academic context. A plumber/waiter/etc. will still usually address people as Mr./Ms./Mrs., even if they have a Phd/Md, because how were they supposed to know about your degree? (And please don’t be one of those people who make the…

You are not alone. Please know that this is something that many, many of us have also felt. And we’re here for you.

They’re specifically talking about the engineering sector, though. Only like 20 percent of engineering students are women, so this is at least representative of the workforce.

ok pal

Here’s the thing: you’re accusing someone of using ad hominem attacks, but upthread talk about MRAs and mansplainers. To label someone either of those things is also an ad hominem attack, is it not?

So... you think saying “statistics need to be understood in context in order to prevent misleading generalizations” is the same as saying “one should never use statistics when testing a hypothesis”?

Right. It’s for married women who prefer “Ms.” Just like “Mrs.” is for married women who prefer “Mrs.”