What do you mean? Gawker has definitely never gleefully ruined anyone’s life over a single ill-advised tweet.

This is a scorching hot take.

I’m not quite sure that believing in respectability politics should warrant a sentence of eternal damnation. But definitely yes for the other stuff.

And you reached out to the co-writer expecting what kind of comment exactly?

I love how the winner apparently has the hand eye coordination to be a champion video game player, but still struggles with the act of giving high fives to the audience.

oh wow. So she was wrong on twitter and on here.

When you’re completely ignorant about a topic, as you are, Wikipedia is a reliable introductory resource.

Gotcha. Thanks for the info!

What was the last positive change you’re referring to?

I’m sorry about your trouble. He’s willing to try and get help, and he’s been a worthy partner of three years — maybe try sticking around when he works on the depression?

Who banned you?

Do we actually know that “much of the Jezebel staff were opposed to the post”? Or is this just wishful thinking? Natasha was the only one I can recall actually speaking up, and she was pro-article.

Go to a psychiatrist, if you can. Good luck.

And you could start with the wikipedia article on Jesus.

You know no one actually doubts that Christ existed, right?

Remember, Taylor Swift is the one who tries too hard.

that’s a mature response.

nice humblebrag

Why does race have anything at all to do with this situation?

I’m sure no married woman has ever wanted to feel attractive to younger men.