Good luck getting a Viper worth having at that price.

Sure is moving fast and breaking stuff

I was about to make a joke about hiding the plates when the VIN is viewable to all, but he’s made up the VIN. And that’s enough for me to say that I’m just not interested in working with this seller. ND.

Pretty much. Looks like it could be, I don’t know, a Nissan?

Agreed: these are gorgeous. Best looking of the Merc Coupes, with a real ‘presence’ out on the road.  Optimistic (naive?) NP:  that’s a lot of car for $7500.

I’m surprised that an ‘89 Buick still used a carburetor and not fuel injection. I could see an econobox from this model year still using a carb, not a mid range car. 

It’s kind of disposable at this point in its life.

Since it’s Hertz, call the police on them.

Never, and please post the seller’s address so we can all rally over there with our pitchforks and torches.

My logic was that someone would want this car, and if they did it’s a NP. I love the interior. I’m not too fond of the styling, but love that it’s clean and mint green. It probably drives like crap, but if you aren’t in a rush who cares. I’m sure I could find a gray over gray one close by with a bit of rust for $1500.…

I used to own a 2004 Mazda6 wagon and loved the hell out of it, and I started it with high mileage (174k) and drove it to the ground at 239,xxx miles, so I believe these have the durability to keep going.

I saw that too and thought (hoped?) that it was just the angle the pic was taken.

This would probably be fine for a “kid’s first car to drive back and forth to school because we don’t care what happens to it,” but not at that price. Volvo or not, it’s still a 38-year-old, non-collectible car.

See to me,I can find a reason to buy it.

This was a car to impress your neighbors a quarter-century ago. The mileage to date ... speaks volumes of its usefulness beyond that initial wow factor.

It has the same issue a contemporary S55 would - whatever the opposite of the goldilocks zone is. It’s old enough that you can get an interesting, more reliable, and equally fast SUV a decade newer for that price. But it’s not old enough to be a classic and there are a lot of shitty MLs of that generation rolling…

NP for the location and pricing. $2000 too high most other places.

That’s a conservative estimate on mileage remaining! It could do half a mil if well tended.

More corporate-speak:  It’s a solution in search of a problem.  ND.

I understand the need for a trailer on one of these, and it makes sense for them to design it to match the rear end of the car, but the repetition just looks wrong.