flyingsaucers
flyingsaucers
flyingsaucers

Yeah you can justify it with weak lore links, but it’s still chintzy crap.

Well, see, cuz it’s a video game. And if the alien were stalking an NPC on another deck of the ship, you wouldn’t be having much fun playing the video game.

A) not stolen.

If you think this game has good graphics, check out Dying Light. Coming right off the DL expac, I couldn’t even play Primal because the graphics are so primitive by comparison.

Astronomically expensive..? Do you have a job?

The same shit is happening with the Rift. VR, wtf?

found the defensive weeaboo

not sure what country you’re livin’ in, but in the US there’s been one heck of a controversy re: violent video games in the past decade.

so eating your own poop was supposed to be a realistic way to commit suicide? ... ?

Your entire post is one tautology after another. Congrats on taking an entire paragraph to write one sentence.

cause you’re on here bitching about the price of enthusiast components

Do you know what the D and the K stand for? CV1 is first gen. Hence the 1.

cool

Ah, no, the story isn’t “great.” It’s typical video game fodder. SOMA has a great story. The Vanishing of Ethan Carter has a great story. ROTTR has a mediocre story that serves to move Lara from one majestic vista to the next.

Nobody wants utter realism. What gamers value is a happy medium; a system that’s fun to play with while echoing reality in a way that makes sense as an artistic interpretation. It’s easier to suspend disbelief when it comes to the HoT mechanic you mentioned because it’s less blatently impossible than Joe Average

“likes to clean trapped”

Gwent isn’t any more complex or high brow than many real world card games that have been played by the proletariate for centuries. Any dirty drifter from the 16th century onward could produce a greasy deck of playing cards & strike up a poker game.

No, it’s like Captain Planet doing literally anything else in the world in addition to recycling.

...a realistic simulation. or it’s supposed to be anyway.

The citation is the historian himself. The information that he’s sharing is common knowledge to any scholar of British history, so unless he’s digging these facts out of a textbook, which is unlikely, then no citation needed.