Except me! But I also say "whom," and, believe me, I never say "nauseous" when I mean "nauseated."

I'm pretty sure I had low rise jeans in 2003 that hit about there.

The photo leaves me with the impression that if she took the bottoms off, she would look like a Barbie doll "down there." I find that far more disturbing than the idea that there are body parts "almost" on display.

Next year's cover is going to be a woman in stirrups with a speculum in. Just right up in it. If we're having this vagina conversation anyway, we might as well see an actual vagina, damnit.

I'm just annoyed at how many people, especially grown women, don't know the difference between a vulva and a vagina. Even if she was wearing nothing below the waist you wouldn't be able to see her vagina in that pose!

When I was in high school, we read The French Lieutenants Woman. One mother absolutely refused to let her seventeen year old son read it due to the "pornographic" sex scene. She insisted that he had no idea about sex and she would be damned - damned! - if he would be learning from school.

One thing I've never understood about "the kids might see it" is if they don't know what they are looking at, why is looking a problem? Also, if they DO know what they are looking at, it's too late to protect them.

Woman poses, picture is chosen for cover, woman is scrutinized instead of the publication.

Forget about the low-slung bikini bottoms - I'm more concerned about how photoshopped his whole thing is. Her skin doesn't even look human anymore. Those boobs look like they belong to a video-game character - like they've been painted on by someone who has never seen real breasts in their life.

Can I please say how much I hate it when people say vagina when they actually mean something else like mons pubis? You can't see a vagina from that angle unless her anatomy is abnormal.

I know. It's porny in an eye-roll worthy kinda way, but it's nothing worse than what's already out there in a million different ways. Instead of pearl clutching how about a decent dialogue about women in sports not being relegated to cheerleaders and looking good on the sidelines... wearing swimsuits. (does this…

Above and beyond the pose....they really photoshopped Hannah Davis into some crazy uncanny valley. I'm certain she's gorgeous, but that photo up top is seriously wigging me out. I don't know enough about the tool to put my finger on what's wrong (I feel like parts are brighter than they should be? and the skin's been…

D'Angelo did it better.

Maybe I'm too liberal but I don't see the big deal. I wish parents were more honest and say that they're uncomfortable looking at half naked people and leave kids out of it. Kids for the most part don't give a shit about a lot of stuff parents worry about. How will this cover harm them?

2015 is the Year of the Mons!
The Year of the Vulval Vestibule!
The Year of the Pudendum!

Blow job week?

I have two minds about this. One is that you are totally right — a fashion show is no place for a toddler. No one else would dare to bring a baby there. The other is, these are parents who, if they don't take their kid to work on a semi-regular basis, would never, ever see their kid. It's actually kind of nice to see…

and as expected, Kanye made it all about himself when he tried to explain Noth tantrum at his show. Lol

Banks needs to shut her mouth. Badu even was gonna take the heat on it by saying she didn't get it due to age. That's not shade. Saying something isn't your scene doesn't mean you're trashing it.

And again, North West had a WONDERFUL time at the shows. Hey 'parents', maybe your accessory has a better time at home with her nanny?