Exactly. For the same reason that I don’t believe that Bill (or Hillary) killed Vince Foster, I don’t believe these accusations.

Agreed. I think that’s key. If Starr didn’t touch this then it leads me to question the validity because you *know* if there was a chance he felt this would damange Clinton, he’d go in guns blazing.

Yup. And everyone seems to be angrier at Hillary for all of this than the man actually accused of rape. Until that stops being the case, I refuse to let the alleged actions of Hillary’s husband impact my opinion of her as a candidate. And she is still by far the best candidate in this election.

I’m skeptical because she seems angrier at Hillary than at the man who allegedly raped her and that shit doesn’t sit well with me. I’m skeptical because she has contradicted herself so many times, and seems to only come out of the woodwork when Hillary is running for something. I’m skeptical because she doesn’t seem…

Why do you think Bill has mistreated women, other than this single allegation? I am genuinely curious. I read the recent Monica Lewinsky interview and she makes it really clear that everything she did was consensual. She really does not want to be painted as a victim of Bill Clinton, although she is clearly a victim…

One of them wants to essentially disintegrate the modern federal government and replace it with a vastly more powerful system of state governments, and the other is a medical doctor who panders to anti-vaccers and people worried about wifi, and whose sole experience in governance is being in a town council.

I don’t know if Bill Clinton raped her or not, but I do find it odd that she seems to focus so much on ruining Hillary’s career over the issue. Her evidence that Hillary even would have known about the incident is shaky at best - Hillary shook her hand and said thank you, in what was perceived to be a menacing tone?…

If you are getting pushback, it may be because suggesting that she is “let[ting] other women’s lives be destroyed by her husband so she could advance her career” is a baffling interpretation of events that occurred decades or years prior to her seeking any kind of political office. It would make a lot more sense to…

He entered thirteen hundredths of a second behind and handed off to the next leg a full second ahead. In a distance that is usually decided by those hundreths. The guys a swimming god.

I did, and he’s right. Mostly.

I’m not outraged because I haven’t seen anyone point to anything that was actually done by the DNC to hurt him. I see a lot of words, but no actions.

It is FRAUD to be “biased”

This.

Is there a single person on planet Earth who was surprised that long time members of the Democratic Party weren’t particularly thrilled with someone changing party affiliation to take advantage of the network and resources of the DNC and then proceeded to run down the DNC every time something didn’t swing his…

I’ve yet to see anything concrete on actions taken to hurt Bernie and help Hillary. I see discussions, but no actions resulting from those discussions.

And that said non-Democrat is back at the Senate as an INDEPENDENT again?

Bullshit.

It’s a political party. It’s not a government agency.

Well...that’s not true.

Bernie voter here too. I certainly don’t like DNC favoritism (it needs to stop, and good riddance DWS), but I’ve not seen any indication that it was in any way outcome-determinative. Clinton simply won the nomination.

This is where I am with the whole thing as well.

Voted for Bernie in the primary and will be eagerly voting for Hillary in November.