fleur-de-livres
fleur de livres
fleur-de-livres

YES so much agree! I love Idina Menzel, but I just felt these songs were awful for her and she was trying to blast them way more than she should or even could. I found it really distracting.

Actually, yes, when they're in the public, they are public figures. That's why we call them public figures. On her own property or anywhere with a reasonable expectation of privacy (e.g. doctor's office) is not public. That's why we call it private.

Fully agree that we should be able to wear anything while having our personal boundaries respected, I really wish we lived in that world.

Dear child, I'm not slut-shaming her. I'm not saying she's a hussy for taking the photos or that she'll burn in hell. I'm saying it's hypocritical to deliberately invite people to look at her and then complain about people looking at her. Maybe if you try reading a little slower?

Please realize that all you're doing is making yourself look like a hysterical child, and dial it back.

Sigh. No. Being looked at while gyrating in tight pants at the gym is a ridiculously different thing from having sex with anyone who asks. That is an absolutely false comparison. Anyone who makes her(or him)self a public figure is asking for attention from — you guessed it — the public. To then complain about getting

Lol.

No, I'm not. GAWKSUCKER's post was commenting on the hypocrisy of plastering her body all over the internet and then complaining that she doesn't want to be looked at. I'm pointing out that this claim doesn't hold water and is just a rather obnoxious humblebrag. If a woman deliberately puts her body out there to be

I wouldn't say that getting a bunch of followers from flaunting her ass (or implants as most commenters seem to think) makes her the next Elon Musk, no. Most 20-year-olds who work out obsessively have good asses. If this is all her identity is wrapped up in, she is going to have serious problems when gravity starts

No, that's what you chose to read out of my comments.

Noooot really the point.

Creepers are not the topic of this thread. I'm not defending them and they gross me out too. But when one deliberately posts selfies online in ways that objectify the body and include the face, then talks about being recognized from it in public, and THEN whines because there's too much staring while using the

I doubt she has many other hobbies besides brushing her hair. Her head is literally up her own ass. Literally-metaphorically.

But she says people recognize her from her prolific butt pics online, they KNOW she wants it to be looked at. She could easily go to the gym in loose clothing that doesn't show the pores on her ass cheeks.

I, too, like to inspire people around the world to be born with innate genetic gifts that epitomize the body fad of the moment.

I've been a little sick about this all day, coming from HER bench in particular. What I'm really hoping is that she only had documents from the Little Sisters and was just waiting to hear the government's side (which I thought Verrilli did very forcefully and eloquently). Maybe they're preparing to take a case dealing

In a romantic comedy, the day that interview was published would be the day she and the future love of her life ran into each other around a corner, crashed to the ground, started arguing, and lived happily ever after.

Yes. If my new husband smashed cake into my face at the reception, I would walk out and have it annulled.

"[J]ust threw her hair up during the reception" sounds like the most horrifying hairball story ever.