I want to see more of that a**.....that woman should move out of the way of the P1 — the view is unfortunately obstructed. hhrrrnnggg....
I want to see more of that a**.....that woman should move out of the way of the P1 — the view is unfortunately obstructed. hhrrrnnggg....
‘Woodly’, my dear. Like ‘worldly’.
I’ve enjoyed every 996 I’ve ever driven. I’m just hoping I can eventually get one before the prices skyrocket.
This article is fantastic. Thanks for giving it life, Alanis.
April was months ago...
Cool history insight! I would only amend this by saying the raddest Pikes Peak racer was in fact any racer going it while it was still dirt.
...I’m already peeved at myself before I make this comment (because I’m totally going to be “that guy”), but we couldn’t get a lead photo from the current season of MotoGP?
I got the message on my phone and immediately dropped it in surprise. A servant handed me another because I don’t like picking things up.
Stef, you get a star for this article if for nothing else than the caption for the lead photo.
The problem with the “should” throughout your statements is that it is based on your point of view as a consumer, and not as a manufacturer.
1. 1994 Chevrolet Camaro Convertible
I say there be created a name for this design approach. The Colin Porsche. Or maybe the Ferdinand Chapman: “Decontent and add value.”
For me, it’s a matter of scale. My current car revs to 6200'ish, and 80 in 6th gear comes in around 3500. That doesn’t bother me toooooo much, but if my redline was only like 5300, then I think I’d worry more about trying to cruise at 3500rpm for long periods of time.