When you're in command and have millions listening, you ought to have something to say.

The real story is why in the world would anyone would be FB friends with family members.

A real alpha-female doesn't need to go behind her husband's back. She does what the fuck she want when she want!

A real alpha-female doesn't need to go behind her husband's back. She does what the fuck she want when she want!

I brought up the findings of a few studies that I've come across, which assist in my understanding of how/why we make choices, and also - humorously - how uncomfortable truths tend to pull certain people from the woodworks so they can publicly display their difficulties in confronting these truths.

Though I disagree with your assertion, how would height issues be any different than race issues, or weight issues, etc? Moreover, how are we to make sense of our 'preferences' in terms of how we internalize the various societal/media forces that shape them, and how we then (and often subconsciously) walk around…

Is it because I'm the one who performed these neurological tests and associated studies?

What I'm saying is: you have no right nor premise to a) tell people that their personally held beliefs (which in this case are not even being inserted into any national or political dialogue, as they are personally held beliefs), or b) that personally held beliefs can in any way be "harmful" to others.

I like 'em a bit gaunt, but your point is certainly valid.

So you'd like to start deciding which viewpoints are "harmful"?

I'm post-grad educated, atheist, radical leftist. I am also 1 million percent pro-choice, but anti-abortion for myself.

So we should protect women from people who have different viewpoints on societal decisions, just because you like to toss the empty word 'shaming' around as if that's something someone can do just by having a personal belief?

Doesn't bother me at all, particularly given that 5'9" is the average US male height, but it seems to have bothered you...enjoy!

Recent neuro-mapping has shown that the pleasure centers stimulated in girls (who are of course way shorter than their fathers) are stimulated in the same area when, as adults, they encounter taller men (the height differentiation remains similar and significant).

This was one study I was attempting to recall. To clarify, I'm not at liberty to refute the claims of either side of this debate, and I am very sex-positive and certainly not attempting to 'shame' performers. But anyway...

Well, these things are stigmatizing (whether true or not) because they cast a shadow of victimhood and abnormalization of performers and their industry.

The reports where pornstars are 'self-reporting' conflict with evidence by those that investigated the legal (criminal and custodial) records of their guardianship. Basically, the latter of these seem to imply that the self-reporting done by pornstars are perfidious, and likely due to their desires to protect…

You might want to keep your 'daddy issues' private...girls who like tall guys are gross that way.

I've heard the same, and if "religious households" aren't the lowest common denomination of "horrible childhoods", I don't know what is!

JGL: Perfect man. Just the right height and weight, handsome but not too pretty.