What political goals did he attempt to achieve with his bombings?

For God sakes Michael you’re smarter than this.

Terrorism needs to target a political goal.

PERIOD.

ZERO evidence has come forth that he was targeting any political goal.

A story can be about 2 things.

You don’t understand what you’re talking about.

Read my prior statements again. Slowly so you get it this time.

At that closing speed lights, turn signals, sirens are all totally useless. PERIOD.

If the Hellcat had perfect signaling it would make ZERO difference.

100% bullshit.

Sounds is useless and the cop is closing on traffic at 80 MPH.

80 miles per hour....think about that. Even if you were looking straight into the rearview mirror you have at most 5 seconds to see the car coming.

In fact the WORST thing a driver could do is react to the car closing on him

At speed like that…

Yeah, coworker tried that about 10 years back on liter bikes. They shut the highway down on them.

Motorola got some legs on her.

I run track days with the guys who train Michigan State Police, I’m sure the Indiana curriculum is similar.. Their training is ok but hardly enough for me to feel confident without knowing the specific officer.

Now you have two cars behaving extremely recklessly (by definition)

Set up a road block and stop the Hellcat…

The Cop chasing him at 150 mph is completely inappropriate, reckless and down right poor judgement.

In Michigan I’m paying over $120 a month for PLPD (zero collision) for a 13 year old WRX with a perfect record.

Michigan rates are stupid.

It’s a turbocharged motor. Simple physics dictates it takes time for the turbos to spool. It is physically impossible to not have turbo lag with their configuration.

The gap on the X axis between yellow line (throttle position) and the purple line (boost pressure) is the turbo lag on a 3.5

Character like this is what we’ll lose once we’ve gone electric.

Now compare those battery health figures to a 500e which has ATM.

It’s not so much about miles it’s about time at extended temperature.

I think that’s a bad comparison.

There’s still a touch of turbo lag in both motors. It’s not bad but you don’t get that v8 push right on tip in. I can see how people unfamiliar with turbo motors see how the v6 EBs “don’t feel right”. The way you drive them is a bit different.

Active thermal management, as in the pack is actively heated AND cooled. The Leafs have a problem rejecting heat which causes pack degradation. This is an issue with both the old and new version. The long range model in the works I think addresses this concern.

Do you have much experience with other turbocharged engines? I’m asking because the Ford feel just like a normal turbo engine it’s going to behave differently than a 5+ liter V8. The 2.7 is a peach the 3.5 ain’t bad but it’s expensive and overkill for a “1/2 ton” chassis. .

Give it another 2 years. Without ATM the Leaf packs are not long for this world even if you live in a more mild climate.

Except the parts are substantially more expensive.

That’s called a Subaru with snows.

A BMW 550 can tow 4400. An old road master would take 5k all day long.