Whaaa, time proves the design not the era which is was produced.
Whaaa, time proves the design not the era which is was produced.
The Costco tires often have different part numbers and often different tread patterns I can only assume the compounds are different. They’re not the same as what you’d buy from Tire Rack, Discount or Belle.
Green was too late 90's early 2000s.
Being poor (or cheap) is expensive.
She never talks about combustion pressure, that makes the article talk around the basic physics.
The engine is built around the forces. Also a large cast iron mass is great at damping vibration from the combustion event.
No. Compression ratio is irrelevant to stroke.
I could have a stroke of 1" and have a 1000:1 compression ratio
And a Dakar Porsche is different how?
2015 Sonic asking 4k. It’s rebuilt so haggle down to 3300.
Tried to get one of these, They have ~3k in rebates applied which are unobtanium.
A used Fiesta 1 liter with 10,000 miles is a far better option. They’re the same price.
The future would like a word with you
It’s a massive glass roof. I’m not sure how much of it moves
The claim maker is the God damn source, not me.
If you wanted to really get into it you could call attacking the source, but not me a genetic fallacy but they’re derivatives of each other. The genetic moniker is far less known so it gets lumped in with Ad Hominem.
Use real argument, not emotion and you’ll get somewhere.
Poor Mercedes.
The red thread?
I buy a new car every 3 years. I will ONLY negotiate via email. Typically the cars I’m buying are uncommon but not premium so I’m flying 1/2 way across the country to drive it home.
I make dealer well aware that I’m there to only sign paperwork. If the numbers change once I’m in the door I’m leaving immediately on…
When there’s actual money on the table people behave like professionals because they are professionals. I strongly doubt the guy you were negotiating with on that 20M project was a car salesman at night.
Car salesmen are generally a bunch of hacks who could not make it a week in the realm of corporate sales.
Please explain.
Did you not read any of their responses?
They said X source is right wing! Your argument is thus invalid!
Only one guy argued a few specific points to refute the article I posted.