intended for “commercial gain” I think is the element (so I should not have used “profit”). Sharing on the internet could mean ad revenues, or increased marketing/notice, which could arguably show an intent to create it for commercial gain.

Using another’s image for commercial gain without permission is a violation of the “right of publicity.”

It’s a violation of the right of publicity. You cannot use someone’s image for a profit without permission.

Just be careful you don’t inhale any!

He’s like Vader, but without the redemption

It’s the perfect drink to accompany Nihilist Arby’s

It’s called Home Ec

Same. Except Grandma’s house :)

I second!

It’s the shadow (as someone else said), but you’re also probably just used to President Stubby Fingers. The contrast is, admittedly, startling.

I love puppers (especially my double-digits aged puppy), but I do not understand the over-the-top love for the wrinkly dogs. People go crazy for those things, but I just don’t get it!

Try to limit your consumption to women artists. Women aren’t perfect, of course, but your odds of not finding a child rapist, sexual harasser, murderer, vile human, are significantly lower!

The obvious solution to this (after going down a Googlehole and reading articles about judging art vs the artist and complicity, etc. in which all the examples of vile acts by artists were male), is to support more female artists.

Gross.

Yes, but no bald women. A few of the dolls look like they’re wearing wigs.

Except the doll collection is more diverse.

I say gross not just because of child molestation or “Ew old[er] people”, but because it’s so transparent that it’s a male story made with the male gaze and just BLECH.

Why is it getting all the love? It’s about an old man obsessed with / trying to get with a much younger woman. GROSS. Also: SEEN IT BEFORE!

Exactly! “Yeah, we get it, you have someone(s) to have sex with. Good for you!”

Yes, but in a law firm, the law firm is treated as a whole. Including for malpractice, etc. Ethics rules dictate that if one attorney has a conflict, it’s a conflict for the entire firm. Two lawyers at the same firm (especially partners) would not be able to represent separate parties in the same deal. Especially when…