Agreed. I own a V8 that gets 17 mpg but it drives maybe 500-1000 miles per year where my EV is what actually does the 10,000+, so it would be dumb to calculate it as if all of my vehicles were being used all of the time.

Ya, by their metrics then anyone with a 401K is also in the hook...in my Probability And Statistics class in college we learned this technique called “skewing”.

Nope. Overpopulation from people breeding like rats is the real-deal climate change problem.

When there is a difference in reporting between the GPS nav and the IRS, the software prioritizes the GPS data and updates the IRS to match. The safe approach is to shut down the GPS so that cannot happen. This is a systems design flaw that exists because if GPS isn’t reliable there are bigger problems, such as…

I’m also wondering since they mention having lots of cars how they’re calculating that. I mean, I’m sure Bill Gates has a pretty substantial car collection, are the emissions for those based on the calculated annual emissions of each car for the average mileage? Or are they using an assumption of, say, 15k miles…

That would require actual research and effort. Some people would call it journalism.

As the saying goes - capitalism is the worst economic theory, except for all the rest of them.

At this stage, what’s more likely is that they use GPS for primary navigation, but routing along airways rather than just going GPS “Direct to.” Then you tune your VORs as a backup in case of GPS errors. You can compare the two as a kind of check on each other; if they disagree, you know something is wrong. …

Man, I like this logic a lot.

Surely you’re not implying that there is some click-baiting going on?

I was a bit skeptical upon seeing the actual graph...

Stanley is replacing a car for someone that purchased a travel cup from them. State Farm won’t even pay someone that has an insurance policy with them

Unique ride at a post-covid fuck-it price. Always liked these things, so, it’s a NP from me.

I love it! 3800? Check. Great cosmetic condition? Check. Weird 80's LCD screens?  Check. NP

Nice for it’s age. Not necessarily desirable just because it’s rare though. But that is low for low mileage and good upkeep. Still. ND for me. 

First off, let me say that knowing the “elderly” people that I do, who are never shy about doing a burnout or two and can afford the tires to do so, buying from the little old lady from Pasadena is not a guarantee that the car hasn’t been flogged like a red haired stepchild. The difference is that they will be more…

When these were built sports car driving me thought of them as a flabby wanna be, oversized and too soft. I saw one (much more derelict than this example) the other day, and next to modern cars it looked petite and kind of attractive. Still not exactly my cup of tea, but I am warming to it. They haven’t aged badly, as…

I love it! Restore the steering wheel, toss in an L67 (if it'll play nice with the electronics, gotta have the cool screen still) and enjoy

I’ve always liked the looks of these, and if everything really works this seems like a steal for some understated Rad. In fact, I’m a little annoyed (but should probably be grateful) it’s so far away. NP

Let’s see.... It’s a dead model that went nowhere...not a stellar recc.