Disagree. I know that you admit that your own line of thinking isn’t fair, and thus faulty. That alone makes you a stupid fuck.

not when you have a case of the accuser making up hoaxes for evidence.

You’re point being wrong and idiotic doesn’t mean I missed it. I get it. It’s just not accurate. It may or may not help him - but it certainly won’t harm him... mainly because stupid fucks like you who still think he may be guilty exist.

Even better is that THIS is the level you went next. I mean, it’s the bullshit shame handbook coming to life. You’re amazingly fun.

If the accuser and/or her mom creating a hoax for evidence doesn’t remove lingering doubt, then you have issues with your problem solving abilities.

Nah

TLDR... but you seem to absolve yourself from being a member of said society now. Sad fact is, you don’t want to change the way you think. You want him to be guilty, and now that he’s actually innocent, you’ll scramble for anything to keep your fucked up line of thinking intact.

You’re the public... maybe quit thinking like an idiot and that’ll help.

no. You’re talking about YOURSELF. Don’t remove yourself from this because you have an idiotic line of thinking. This entire thread started because you’re a gullible idiot.

as long as you don’t rape me after I off myself

You not understanding the law, and admitting your own line of thinking isn’t fair shows me that you have nothing of substance to offer. You’re the person that basically proves why an accusation is all you need to ruin someone. You still having doubt even after a freakin hoax was created to give her evidence on said…

Kane’s rep is already damaged. I’d have no issue with him if he filed suit. And TBH, he should. His image won’t repair from that, but it doesn’t mean he should let it slide either.

That’s a you problem, not a Patrick Kane problem.

Have we reached the point where a rape accusation against a public figure must be believed, and if it turns out that criminal charges aren’t pursued it must be because of some conspiracy or prejudice?

The Prosecutor was livid, and basically said that if he could find a way to charge he, he would, but that he couldn’t find any actual law she broke.

Proven innocent? You don’t know how the justice system works, do you? Accusing someone, and then needing a hoax to create the evidence you’d need for said accusation, is not on Patrick Kane.

a chick falsely accusing someone of rape makes it hard for you to watch the Blackhawks?

because he’s a victim now?

annnnd there it is... I was actually going to comment that some whack job would come with this. But well done, you actually did it.