I have to admit, I don’t think I ever saw that. That seems like going to the extreme, and I must admit as a lover of Jezebel seems unecessary, even if “Jackie”’s story had been true and this journalist/blogger was wrong.

You could probably update this to include the fact that he actually didn’t cancel his appearances.

Still operating on the Gawker school of journalistic integrity, I see?

I recall that there were plenty of people who said maybe we should pump the brakes on this story since parts of it aren’t adding up. Granted, those people were tarred and feathered on Jezebel and Gawker, but they certainly existed. One particular person was roundly ridiculed for daring to question the story and…

Even people with journalism degrees from Columbia.

Jezebel is full of bitter White Feminists™, the sky is blue, water is wet.

I’m like 90% sure you’re a troll, but in the off chance you’re not, here’s a few points:

Can we take a moment to talk about how cringey it is to say you can “cause a lot of” fallout because you’re a “huge film fan / amateur film maker”? Lol ok

The fact that the lawsuit was funded by an angry billionaire is immaterial. What is material is that they published something they had no legal right to do so, and ignored a request for it to be taken down (at least according to a court in Florida, as this fact is being appealed). Remember Gawker got away with it…

Wow! All of her stories seem a bit petty. However, the usual advice to victims is to document every event in detail. She may have just passed on those stories to the university (or police?) on the advice of an attorney, hoping that the university (or court?) would make the right determination about what constitutes a…

This is an excised quotation on a blog about an op-ed about a dean’s comments about what a boy might have been thinking in reaction to a girl’s statement as later described in a 93-page report that’s missing more than 92 of its pages.

It is cumulative. The statement from US Soccer includes the line

So what they’re saying is that they really, REALLY want to out this victim Gawker style. We should support this.

It doesn’t sound like any of the rapes occurred through the Uber app- first, as you say, there’s the “no money for a ride” BS, but also the Uber app tracks the driver and their licence plate for every trip, so it wouldn’t have taken a victim remembering the licence plate number to catch him had it been happening via…

Their police rob olympic swimmers at gun point

Partly, I assume, because of optics. The timing of her public allegations have tended to make her look pretty shitty. I mean, she filed for divorce 2 days after his mom died, made accusations of DV but didn’t file charges then got a restraining order on his teen aged daughter’s birthday, a week to the day of her…

Is Amber going to be donating to charity like Heather Mills donated to charity? I will believe it what I see it (as i have said to everyone on this thread who points out the ‘giving to charity’ angle. She might do some photo ops but no way is she going to give away her payday. It’s Hollywood, folks, and Amber and…

If anyone didn’t see that her game was to get a pay off from the get go then they need their head examined. She said a lot of things about filing police reports and being a role model for DV victims but at the end of the day she wanted the cash. I don’t fault her for it because it’s obvious that was her game from the…

She said YESTERDAY that was her aim. To have him admit on paper what he did. Today, she’s taken a settlement.

Of course she is. She has her own DV arrest and her old coke dealer is pretty frank about what kind of woman she is. I think they’re both nuts and getting together was the worst thing that could have ever happened to either of them. I hope both remember to not hit and/or abuse others. Amber has a DV on her record (and…

That’s what you got from this?