Hahah those turds! They deserve what’s coming to them. I quite like those squirrel proofed bird feeders that send them spinning until they get flung off 😂. Luckily no squirrels here, just birds and bugs!
Hahah those turds! They deserve what’s coming to them. I quite like those squirrel proofed bird feeders that send them spinning until they get flung off 😂. Luckily no squirrels here, just birds and bugs!
Fuck New York. Let’s work on getting me some pandas.
That’s because some pets/animals are so awesome that even evil people like them.
Makes sense, but it could be argued that the victim did see the officers as officers- agents of the state- when she went out socializing with them. In her position, it would have been very difficult if not perceived as sabotaging her case to refuse to make nice and go along. There’s a factor of coercion based on their…
It’s also frustrating because if an organization isn’t responsible for your actions outside of the scope of employment, then why are people fired for what they do off the job? Not that there aren’t terrible people doing awful crap who should probably be let go of anyway, but you can’t have it both ways.
Recently got into cross stitch. These are the first two patterns I bought, and I’m not even kidding.
I can't...stop watching...this gif...it's everything to me.
All jokes aside, there is a line of legal reasoning that excludes employers from responsibility for when their employees do horseshit like this, because their shenanigans aren’t within the scope of their employment. No one seems to ask the next question, which is, “Okay, but if that’s true, doesn’t that mean that no…
“The NYPD does not have an obligation to train officers not to commit sexual assault because it is an obvious criminal act.”
I may be old school, but if I’m testifying before Congress I am going to wear a tie. Obviously that’s not the worst thing about him but it plays “disrespectful” to me.
Gee, it’s not like you could call for *REGULATIONS to be passed* to end the price-gouging for life-saving drugs or anything.
But sure, mildly chastise him while he laughs at you - (and throw god in there to pander to the theocrats).
They’re mad when the cameras are there at the *height of a news cycle* - (surely there are plenty who fist bumped in secret).
I for one will not be upset when he “overdoses” (read:assassinated)
Of course. Shitbags like this ruin the image of “compassionate capitalism”, and the notion that drug companies are altruistic in nature. Which in turn fucks up campaign contributions because revenues are off.
before they begged him to be a good boy because he has so much potential as a “force for good”? They seemed more hurt than angry. It was like how could one of the vipers they had nursed at their bosom smirk at them! After all they had one for him in terms of deregulation!
I’m usually not one to “diagnose” random people in the news with anything, but sociopathy seems just so marvelously accurate for him.
its his chronic stupid face expression
“I truly believe you could become a force of tremendous good,” Cummings said, begging him against to “reflect on it” before ending with “God bless you.”
That’s his resting bitch smirk.
The way I see it, you can go down in history as the poster boy for greedy drug company executives, or you can change the system. You have detailed knowledge about drug companies and the system we have today, and I truly believe—are you listening?