feinguy
feinguy
feinguy

You mean capoeira?

wataaaaaa!!!!!

It's Mad Max not Mad Maxine.

So, to clarify, you are upset that you don't have a seat at the table, when you would use that seat to disband the entire discussion? The discussion you are upset you don't get to participate in?

I'm sorry you feel that poorly reasoned contrariness is what you are left with, because it really isn't doing you any favors.

Trust me this is where I and many people like me including my close friends are left with. We have no other recourse. We attempt to ignore feminists and they get more powerful in their echo chamber. They vote no one i know votes. They shape policy that hurts me (title IV). And so I attempt to engage. Battling against

The consequences are that we are blinded from the truth. That we are in a cyclical dogmatic circle jerk of perpetual wheel spinning. You sound like a CIA troll trying to get me to admit I'm a terrorist. As a male scientist leader and artist I want to see the world get better in order to properly move forward we need

It's Jezebel. You have to throw in the "slut-shame" buzzword in order to get an article about "women" and "sex" published.

No she isn't. She said you shouldn't physically abuse people who are stronger than you and expect them to sit and take it.

Any nudes?

Do you think that word magic, politically savy talk, non offending ways to paint inability is more important THAN REASON AND LOGIC?

Lol you do realize this article directly quotes an investor saying that he doesn't invest in women's ideas because they have emotionally charged thoughts right? Do you think ragey crying is a good response to this kind of allegation?

"Getting creeped on is a sadly common experience for lady geeks roving crowded exhibit floors, especially cosplayers."

Those are nothing compared to the contributions of men. I'd say that woman's greatest achievement is about 100,000th on the list of achievements by men.

I'm sorry even if it was a success it don't get it and the whole thing makes no sense.

...because the accuracy of the tweet is actually verifiably false?

I mean, I can understand a platform bias being the sort of thing that invokes ire from the readership, but when the tweet itself is demonstrably false, that's not bias at work—that's self-inflicted foolishness on the part of the person/entity

That doesn't really bother me...BUT I am scared of spiders, centipedes, and millipedes. (especially those huge ones hiding in the woods) But, nothing invokes fear in me like these things....

So far, one of the best looking current gen games I've played by a country mile.

13) Bringing Arnold Schwarzenegger to America.

Be honest... You thought it!