This is what I adore about Farcry series. And love how they are making it more and more important. Even in games like Meta Gear Solid series, they give you the lowdown on binoculars and getting visual intel, but it was never all that crucial for most of the game.

Please support The Witcher 3, then. It does everything right.

Things like this bring a tear to my eye. To see this is what my favorite hobby has turned into. I weep for the generations to follow. They will never know the glory days of the Nes/Snes/N64/etc where you simply paid money for a game and played it. Where a game developer didn't have their hands in your back pocket…

But they are going about it the wrong way, bully tactics, shaming, etc.. to get women and/or minorities represented in games in a positive way. How about if there are no women in a game or if so they are presented in a bad way to you then don't buy it? That will not work because they don't have the buying power, so…

Completely different argument. Your argument is that you can't criticize a game if you're not a developer or a movie if you're not a director. And you would be correct, if that's what mr beerman was saying, but he's not. He's saying if you want to see something in a game, feel free to make it yourself, but don't…

Nope, tired of you idiots saying that for no reason, I am here to say it's a good argument.

To *create* gender issues in games. There are no issues, if you want more women in games or a different type of woman then YOU make the games you want, do not try and change other people's art.

No, it was about the amount of content in the main game, compared to the amount of content being offered as DLC - price factors into that as well.

Nintendo is adding what's basically HALF of a full Mario Kart game (four completely new circuits, with four courses each, and then extra characters and karts as well) to MK8 as DLC that totals less than a quarter of the game's original asking price.

I'm not saying "Ubisoft is putting a gun to your head and telling you they'll kill you if you don't buy it".

Because unlike Nintendo, those companies release shallow, unfinished pieces of garbage with no content and then EXPECT pay-only DLC to just fly off the shelves after already releasing something that was barely (if even) worth the initial $60 asking price.

Put frankly, it's because it's made by Nintendo, and not a scum-sucking, cash-grabbing piece of garbage like EA, Ubisoft or Activision. They're trying to make DLC people WANT to buy, rather than making DLC they have to buy.

Which is one of the many reasons giant 1000 person teams are a terrible idea. They also contribute to Unity's design problem of having a million different things to do in the game, most of which aren't very fun or connected in any way, and lead to no greater meaningful experience because everyone is working on some…

Thank you for logic and reason in this pit of misandry...

We need to be very cautious about supporting re-make games like this, lest we create in the game industry what has now become a scourge in film. I won't be picking this up.

The gender proportion of the general population has absolutely zero relevancy to the target audience for the types of games that are widely criticized by feminist gaming critics. They are still overwhelmingly male.

If games are only targeted for the straight white misogynist portion of 30% (which would be less again unless you honestly believe that all white men hate women) then why is game development such a lucrative business?

Oh fuck YOU and your endless victim complex. So what if women are 51% of the population? That has no bearing on how many of them buy games, which is next to none! And don't bother trying to trot out cooked-up statistics by the ESA that make the number of women playing games seem close to the number of men. They're…

there is no "line". dont like it dont play it. simple

3.5 million from April-June 2014.. the PS4 was released in November 2013. I'm pretty sure they have topped 10 million.