Again, I’m not saying it wasn’t clever or a good idea. I’m saying the crabs themselves were laughably bad. It was terrible CGI, even for a TV show.

It was laughably bad. I don’t think the CGI on the main series or this spinoff has ever been so terrible (and given all the terrible CGI used on the boat, such as the rear raft opening, that’s saying something) — it really took away my suspension of disbelief.

Weird, I thought that was incredibly boring, and the CGI crabs in the scene prior were laughably bad.

They’re waiting two years between seasons in the U.S.? Well, the show’s as good as dead then.

Pretty sure “Humans” is coming back at some point this summer.

Germain, I feel like you’re just trolling us now when it comes to Ghostbusters.

Man, you’ve gotta ease up on the nerd rage. You’ve just spent a few posts raging about a director who made two well-reviewed movies as his first films, an Oscar-nominated actress who is almost always praised for her work, and a director who has shot five well-reviewed movies and produced a large amount of other…

Get out.

Fair enough. But let’s revisit this conversation when “Blade Runner 2” comes out. I feel confident in the faith I’m putting in a fantastic director and the people he’s working with, both in terms of on-screen and off-screen talent.

“Creed” disagrees with you. It’s a premise that has no business resulting in a good movie (at least in my opinion), but Ryan Coogler knocked it out of the park in every aspect.

Here’s my question: Why the fuck would you NOT see it with Denis Villeneuve directing? Do you just hate amazing filmmakers?

He was great for what the BvS script allowed him to be, so I’m eagerly anticipating seeing Affleck getting to write and direct his own version of Batman. He’s probably a better writer and director than actor, and he’s not even a bad actor! So, yeah, this is great news.

I don’t know where you got your data from, but all the projections I saw had the film pegged for a $150-170 million opening — nowhere near $180-200 million.

Even though I don’t think there’s any way you could have made a great movie with what Snyder wanted, I think you could have absolutely made a good one with better editing and removing about 17 subplots.

Here I thought you were going to say it likely didn’t pass The Passion because of that movie’s action-figure and toy lines (including a real crown of thorns!).

How dare you forget the hyphen on a site for geeks. How. Dare. You.

I’m probably in the (very small) minority, but I’m not a big fan of the Spider-Man look.

I still don’t think the humor really fits the style of the original movies, which is a bummer, but this looks better than the first trailer.

I think the cast is terrific, but the trailer amplifies my doubts about Feig — I just don’t think he can nail the serious-yet-sometimes-goofy tone of the original movie. The great part about the original was that you really bought into the world, but the characters were awkward in a believable way that made it all…

The real burning question: When are Marvel’s movies going to stop focusing on superheroes getting into fights with each other and start focusing on fighting each movie’s actual villain or conflict? Such a sad departure from the original “Iron Man.”