I'll second that on the boar, at least the way my host prepared it two summers ago in a sausage with herbs. I actually applauded.

I totally agree with you ... on earth. But in zero-gravity, I don't think the support is really relevant. The teensy-weensy top is there to cover up and, maybe, keep everything oriented the way we are used to.

Oh, yeah, and bison in burgers. Lean but good.

I've had some of these (but not the seal, ostrich, elk or bear) and like them except for goat. I'll add:

I've eaten plenty of goat. I've even pretended to like it. But now I'm old and crotchety, and goat is off my personal menu.

I like it. I like it at least as much as any other Wonder Woman costume ever, which isn't a whole heckuva lot, but I do like it. My favorite part is the smile.

There's are some lengthy responses in another thread that make this point, but I just want to say this briefly:

You mean the Horta? Obviously, we mind-meld with them and .... Wait, you're talking about real life. Never mind. I've got no freaking clue.

Well, okay. But worse than Silver-Age Superman?

Fascinating question in general. As to the religious side, I think the proposition that definitive evidence of extraterrestrial life would somehow make religions disappear is shortsighted. It fails to take into account the diversity and adaptability of human religions.

"Romeo and Juliet."

What about some Golden Age Wonder Woman Valentines for the bondage set?

Eisenberg, Hackman, Spacey — all fine answers to the wrong question.

After a bunch of movies and a long-running TV show, the question is no longer "Who will the studio cast as Luthor?" It is, or should be, "Who will the studio cast as Brainiac / Metallo / Doomsday / Darkseid / Myxyztplk /Mongul / Dabney Donovan /…

I sat up the other night watching "Dinosaur Island," Roger Corman's remake of "Untamed Women." It's a movie so bad I had to watch it in 10-minute excerpts, and wasn't ever able to finish. Lousy acting, lousy effects, lousy script that has the bad manners to try smirking at its own lousiness and fail. Mostly just an…

I've written to Google already. Anybody else?

Gotta say, I'm with you here. And I'm a trained theologian.

#1, from St. Anselm, is one of the first things they teach us in seminary. Not because it's especially convincing, just because it's a classic. I'm not sure anybody actually actually hears it and goes, "oh, yeah, that solves the problem." I'm not even…

The iceberg theory works. Another expression might be, "Know it, don't show it."

Ah. Lamont-Doherty, you say. Well, that does shoot my revenge-snark plan all to hell. But, in my defense, it is still confusing to place Columbia University there.

He probably couldn't meet the clinical criteria, but I think you may be making him sound a little less psychologically troubled than Doyle hints at.

It sounds an awful lot like the New Scientist article is identifying Columbia University as an institution located in Palisades, NY — the teensy hamlet most of us have always called Sneden's Landing.

Actually, I wonder if there aren't people who filter it for religious reasons ... And avoid tea when dining out.