I know that. I’m a writer and an illustrator. My question is how is this article saying they should acknowledge it?

Is that what they were going for, though? Were they trying to terrify you? I’ve never played Far Cry, but from what I’ve seen the games seem to use everything in them as backdrop for shooting things. And you’re welcome to not like that, but if they weren’t trying to scare you, then maybe play horror games about cults…

I’m kind of confused by this... are you asking artists to give you definitive yes or no answers about the themes and political situations or not? And I don’t understand how, if there are clearly shown or stated politics in a game... that they need to further explain those shown or stated politics?

They are athletic shorts for ladies. Especially helpful when climbing through dangerous ceiling areas.

“Remind yourself that what you write doesn’t need to be good; it just needs to exist.”

Have you heard of this little indie game called Street Fighter.....?

But yet you’ll all worship the new DOOM reboot even though it is literally the definition of hypermale powered fantasy. It doesn’t show T and A, but does have pile of blood and gore... which, somehow, watching a guy rip the spine out of some other dude is still more acceptable than said T and A.

While I agree with your main point, there’s a difference between being exposed to technology in a way that makes learning it’s inner workings feasible and just being handed a smart phone.

That’s because of storytelling / cinematography. The way you shoot something, set the mood, etc... plays the bigger factor than the specific monster.

Yeah. I just saw that Nerdist removed all mention of him from all their media / social media. Given that info, I’ve changed my mind.

I’m sorry about your brother. I have no doubt that there are many people who would leave gang life if given a genuinely safe alternative. Funnily enough, I’ve been watching this show called Black Sails, where the British government literally gives pirates a clean slate and a pardon. It’s based in fact. Granted, this…

I agree with you, I’m just saying we tend to think that being informed somehow makes things better in terms of actionable results.

You’re assuming that he will respond. Unless she names him, he probably won’t.

I’ve studied the gang issue a lot. A big part of it stems from disenfranchised youth and a general poor populace, who are easy targets. Without them, the whole thing would fall apart. I worked through all of high school with kids in the foster care system in the US.

Reading articles doesn’t, in and of itself, help either.

Fairness and expectations.

“If Hillary had divorced Bill back in the day, maybe she’d be president now.”

I’m pretty sure that was sarcasm.

There was this kid named Matt in middle school that my group of friends was forced to be friends with. Short version: he was a raging cunt, had no friends, and we were the nerdy kids who were nice.

I didn’t say Top 10. I said Top 100.