Oh, and by the way? If they need more time to review documents, I'm certain they could get the date pushed back.
Oh, and by the way? If they need more time to review documents, I'm certain they could get the date pushed back.
I'm an attorney, and my firm does some defense work. Never in a million years would we do something like this. I have repeatedly tried to explain to people that when you defend someone accused of rape, you have a duty to do some unpleasant things, but THIS IS NOT ONE OF THEM.
I'm sorry. I did what I could. I told my friends to vote. I delivered voter registration papers to someone's hospital room. I took someone to vote. I talked to even one of my most conservative friends about why it was important to vote No one 1. God I'm so angry, disgusted, and frustrated right now. There are many…
So, at 100 pages a day he'll get through it all in 10 days and still have 3 days to go over the important ones again? Man, that's rough.
There are actually some FL Bar codes of ethics that pertain to use of social media. I'm hoping they nail his ass to the wall.
Also, his complaint is BS. It's not 1000 documents, it's 1000 pages, and many of those pages will be blank cover sheets or duplicates. Man up and do your reading. Your law school assignments were worse than this.
It's like cramming a whole pile of legal information in a short period of time is part of the job or something.
What an idiot. As an attorney I've had to read 1,000 pages in a day. The client doesn't have to read them, you do, and then you tell them what they say. So in addition to this scummy disclosure, it's not even a valid complaint.
What does that tweet even mean? "Learn 1000 documents"?
It doesn't have to be illegal to get disbarred—though I doubt the punishment will be that—more like censure or suspension. Lawyers are subject to ethical standards by the professional bar. Posting her name to twitter is hostile and unnecessary regardless of the public record. A reference to due process will not…
The accuser is not on trial, and if the state did not think that there was a case to be made against the accused, they would not take the case. It is not in the state's best interest to take cases that are bullshit because it doesn't always win.
/5 ITS ABOUT THE ETHICS!!!
"Sooooooooooooooooooooooomeone's gettin' disbaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarred...."
I agree. It's also just so wildly unprofessional.
5/ We need to know who to harass on Twitter.
This may constitute retaliation under Title IX proceedings. I wouldn't allow the lawyer into the proceedings anymore if I were that investigator.
Jameis went for years without raping someone...
I think I'm most bothered he did it on Twitter. It's one thing to say your accuser should be named in court or even in media interviews, but it seems much more under handed to mention it on Twitter just to disseminate it as far as you can.
BUT IT'S THE PUBLIC'S RIGHT TO KNOW REBECCA!!!!!!!!!
or . . .
1/ Her identity being known is in the public interest! It affects how I butter my toast in the morning!!!!!!111
2/ Everyone needs to know who the victim is. This will of course help the victim. It will also encourage more victims to come forward./
3/ The…
because of assholes like you who send death threats.