Have a star, I could not agree more.

Exactly, due process is justified on some kind of ambiguous he said/they said type deal, but when it’s there’s absolutely no room for doubt and no excuses for what happened, the pre-trial period waiting period should be behind bars. He destroyed lives, he should get the same in return, and now, not later.

Lawrence got his free vacation, what else do you need to know?

Imagine an S2000 with the motor out of the new Civic R?

Oh you poor snowflakes. If I based all of my buying decisions on the antics of the company’s CEOs I’d be wearing sackcloth and eating bread.

I am big of a UF defender as you can get. I agree with the undersized proportions for its class. It was noticeably smaller than its competitors like the Accord and Camry. I still love my base model one. 130k miles and running strong. 36MPG around town. It’s still one of the more comfortable rides I’ve been in. All…

I always wonder why Chrysler went for the tweener size. Was it the physical limitations of the platform? Or were they that concerned about eating 300 sales? (as if a 300 customer would ever consider a 200) They already had the Dart as a compact, so I always thought the 200 should have been majorly sized up.

The gen. 2 Chrysler 200 had a lot more swagger and swankiness than other midsize cars. It was somewhat hamstrung by the problematic early 9-speed ZF transaxle, and by Chrysler’s heretofore dismal reputation for building passenger cars.

The Honda S2000.

I think we’re about to see a whole lot of people underwater in a whole lot of asset categories. Cars and homes (especially vacation homes) at the top of the list. Lower prices after the recent period of insanity AND higher interest rates?  Be ready to hold on for a long time.

Not only is the public whining ridiculous, so is the lack of critical analysis from the writers of these pieces. So many makes and models had various dealer add-ons that often resulted in five figure price increases above MSRP over the last couple of years. All of those buyers are already seeing or about to see buyers…

1st Gear:

Since this car does nothing for me, here is a comment from a typical buyer who is definitely a real customer being compensated for their time and also AI:

I’m not seeing it. the bottoms of the wheels are obscured by the Jersey barrier in the foreground of the shot.

Why even develop a six cylinder if its going to come in that close to the standard engine. They aren’t a big company, seems wasteful.  

Correct.  It’s a physics thing.  Good bushings and a steering stabilizer keep it at bay but once one of those things starts to not be in literal perfect condition it comes back.  Nature of the beast with a solid front axle.

I feel like every few years a new lawsuit about it pops up and Jeep has to remind everyone that’s how physics works and then everyone in comments here laughs at the people who overpaid for mall crawlers. It’s a vicious cycle (literally and figuratively).

I think the product looks great and I’ve heard similar things about reliability, but my main hangup is I’m afraid they will abandon the U.S. market again and leave me with an expensive novelty.

17's and early 18's really (my QV is a 18MY but a late 17 build and had some quirks early on). My later cars, 2019 Giulia, Stelvio and 2023 Stelvio are rock solid. Better reliability than my 2018 GTI for sure.

Yes, but it required three failures to occur. First, the APU did not work. Second, she ignored the safety briefings. Third, she ignored common sense by ignoring the visible spinning disc at the center of each engine.