Because that 2.6 mitsi 4 was the worst engine ever. Good friend had a Challenger. Timing chain ate through the timing cover, spit out all the oil and seized up. I had that crapper in a Caravan, the Mopar fix was folding sheet metal and plastic coating it. Kept the chain from eating through, but it broke at the fold…

The first time it was mentioned it was hyperlinked to an article that would explain, but I’ll fill you in.
It’s a joking reference to the asinine conservative conspiracy theory that this accident happened because of DEI hiring practices or because of the new “woke” Infrastructure Act. That’s obviously ridiculous either…

It’s a mess. And yeah, some for years. Pretty recently there was Mohammed Aisha, who was stuck on a ship for four years. A court declared him guardian of the ship and he was legally required to stay on the boat, unpaid, and was stuck on the boat basically by himself for a huge amount of those four years. Eventually,…

You can’t just abandon it.

At first glance, it looked like any other Daytona at the time. It had bigger wheel wells, giving it an almost widebody look that a Charger Scat Pack would be proud of.

First thing I thought of too. But the plane’s accident history is more the fault of well-heeled people who could afford to fly one but didn’t stay proficient in them.

Absolutely no propeller-powered, all-metal aircraft should be breaking apart in the air from turning too fast.

Hear, Hear. There is never any reason to question what you see on TV.

Vne on one of these is 125 knots, it is not an aerobatic aircraft 

They were disabled/stopped from a previous collision. Branham dipped into that tiny gap between them in an attempt to overtake and gain maybe 1 second of time, then swung wide into the oncoming lane. Witnesses reported him driving recklessly and nearly causing other collisions before approaching the accident scene as…

That is what I was thinking he descended and exceeded the never exceed speed and the wings decided they were done flying.

Wasn’t Porsche the ones claiming a publicity stunt as fact, and wasn't Porsche the ones caught in the lie. 

Sure, but Sully landed one in the Hudson river, so you never know. :)
Anyway, one can draw up doomsday scenarios all day long, but you’re still safer in commercial over GA.

$80k is the new $60k, so it feels priced right, especially as it seems like a huge step up in terms of tech, refinement, and quality from the current gas XC90 - which incredibly is almost 10 years old. I’m also not sure anyone shopping for a Volvo SUV cares about standing out, perhaps quite the opposite. It’s also 100…

Neither of your options are EVs, so you already are paying a premium on the tech.

Accidents from maintenance issues are not all that common, the big issue is the pilot, they may not have enough experience or not have flown enough recently and then there is the poor decision making with regards to weather and their own skill levels. As this one broke apart in flight I would suspect that the guy went…

ask that question to yourself, because you seem quite triggered over the whole thing. lol

Sure, bud. It’s the Porsche owners who have fragile egos. Not the vapid man-baby who buys entire companies on a whim (only to burn billions by failing by every conceivable metric) and his bootlicking fans.

Who cares? Very clearly Tesla cared since they invented the story ...

Plenty of build out by other companies. There’s Ioonna, which has the backing of BMW, GM, Honda, Hyundai, Kia, Mercedes, and Stellantis.  British Petroleum also announced last week their intent of purchasing either completed or now cancelled Telsa supercharger sites for their own network.