Can confirm. I miss my ‘96 Grand Am.

Is that Jesse Pinkman?

We’re not talking about child porn (which is illegal on its own), so you can’t just treat them as the same thing. It’s not illegal to photoshop somebody’s head onto another body.

So they were already online? Or just on his hard drive? And was it accidental or on purpose? This article could have used a lot more detail. Unless he went around posting them all over the place, it doesn’t seem fair to say he “publicized” them.

LOL, project much? You’re not even addressing my point. Too stupid to grasp it? If he didn’t even make it then it’s even more of a nothingburger. However pathetic you may find something doesn’t make it a violation of consent. But you appeal to those emotions and ad hominems if you have to.

And they should be held accountable if they do so. That is not what my comment was about. To quote your first comment “what the hell is your point?”

What’s crazy to me is that she undoubtedly has more than enough money to just do that herself. She’s a DINO corporate sellout that kneecaps anything remotely progressive in the Senate, rich donors love her. How is it even worth her time? This is like me filling out a survey for a 20 cent rebate. Why bother?

AKA, standard rich middle-American. More likely they won the oil rig lottery.

Remember, the reason to make a claim is not because it’s worth the chump change, but because that chump change adds up across thousands of people and creates a financial consequence for wrongdoing.

I’ve never had trouble keeping partners’ photos private. Do you? They don’t sprout wings and fly away...

Apparently we need to clarify what is being discussed; is it faking porn for one’s own personal use, or to publish it online for ridicule or passing it off as real? Big difference.

Any argument can be made. That one, however, is a massive violation of the most fundamental human freedom; thought. It’s also dumb as shit.

It doesn’t say in the article that he published them online. If that’s the case, then I get it.

Why can’t the Dems do what the right does, and brand this as the “Trump Collapse”? It’s so freaking easy and yet they never play politics like that. They never push a coordinated narrative by repeating quippy talking points.

Point completely missed.

Exactly. How did such a stupid comment get so upvoted? Cars aren’t cellphones. Duh.

LOL, what? The batteries may get smaller or lighter, but there is no evidence to suggest Americans will stop buying SUVs any time soon.

I have bad news; photoshop has been around since the 1990s. This is like saying that masturbating to the image of what someone looks like in your head is some kind of violation. Ridiculous.

Gee, I don’t know. What happens when there is unmet demand in an economy? Money lying on the table for the taking in a capitalist economy. I guess we’ll never know...

It makes sense. All the negative traits of an SUV driver multiplied by the negative traits of a Hellcat Charger owner.