The better question is this one, which I’ve seen elsewhere.

That’s what a predestination paradox is.  You can’t go back in time to prevent an event from happening because then you won’t have any reason to go back in time in the first place, thus you won’t be there to prevent it.

Agreed it’s a pointless question. If Time Travel was involved, I’d just prevent his parents from having sex at that particular point in time - problem solved and nobody harmed. Didn’t anybody watch “About Time”?

Clearly, the real argument I guess here is: if Baby Hitler were a hot dog, would you eat him before he could eat himself?

In all honesty, the Quip toothbrush is a very good product.

Would I kill baby Hitler? I mean... how many babies are dying/have died in Yemen in the last year that weren’t going to commit genocide while we have this stupid conversation, eh Ben? Nothing to say about those babies, huh? The ones who are here, right now, and whose saving don’t require a technology that your party…

It’s a moot point, because you can’t go back in time and kill baby Hitler. Not because time travel doesn’t exist, but because it’s a predestination paradox.

This is definitely a new tactic they’re pushing lately. I had someone in the comments come at me with the “science” angle a few weeks ago, linking to like one crackpot female doctor who’s been advocating this pro-life “science” (because everyone knows, all you need is one ‘scientist’ to reach a definitive conclusion…

Anti-abortion leaders are changing their slogan from “pro-life” to “pro-science.” An incredible pivot.

Anti-abortion leaders are changing their slogan from “pro-life” to “pro-science.”

“Pro-life is pro-science.”

• Anti-abortion leaders are changing their slogan from “pro-life” to “pro-science.” An incredible pivot. [Stat News]

This is a classic tactic religious fanatics have used before, using “Creation Science” to attempt to teach creationism in schools. Apparently, they are so clueless as to the meaning of the word “science” that they think literally adding the word to something makes it fact. This is another reason why people should…

Rather than getting his information from his daily briefing, he prefers “alternative facts”

The thing is, as a government employee myself (Canadian, thankfully), I actually like working in the public service. So many of us are die-hard Leslie Knope types. Regardless of political party in power, that doesn’t change. It’s nice when the government actually lets you do that job, though. 

Defense of Marriage Act?

King of opposite name bills are the “Right to Work” bills. Although I guess they do boil down to having the “right” to work two or three jobs with no benefits until you die.

Anti-abortion leaders are changing their slogan from “pro-life” to “pro-science.” An incredible pivot.

This isn’t a bug as far as Trump and the GOP are concerned, it’s a feature.