That was my first thought.

As fuck.

So it speaks a few words of Stagehand.

I would not be surprised to learn, in a Grisham-quality plot twist, that the father and this judge are fucking.

Few things are more ridiculous than those who pretend their holy book forbids them from filing papework for people with similar genitals who might later do married sexytime.

Weddings are religious rituals. A cake is catering.

WHAT BIBLE ARE THESE PEOPLE READING? The Bible everybody else reads does not mention wedding cakes at all. Does the bakers' religion forbid customers from ever having gay sex after consuming the cake? Is the cake actually IN the sexytime? WHAT UNHOLY FROSTED RITUALS DO THEY FEAR?

Yes. Not serving certain products is acceptable. Not serving certain PEOPLE because of their inherent human characteristics is not.

Operating a business in the public sphere means you agree to comply with anti-discrimination laws. Nobody forced the business owners to do that.

That's obviously Kim Kardashian as Xena the Warrior Princess, and as such needs no introduction.

This is such bullshit. Everybody knows Nikola Tesla said this.

NO WE MUST NOT SEE CURVED HUMAN SKIN WITH OMG SLIGHTLY DIFFERENTLY SHADED CIRCLES OF SKIN.
{{ clutches pearls, faints }}

Watching Pitch Perfect 2, the only thing that strained my willing suspension of disbelief was the incomparable Anna Kendrick’s eyelashes.

You look great in all of these photos.

I “insinuate” no such thing. I wrote twelve words which together are very clearly a sentence with a specific message. You beclown yourself.

No scientists on this list.

You seem to be responding to the wrong comment. Your response is unrelated to my comment.