"five carbon atoms—the same stuff in your pencil—arranged in a hexagon."

@xd.Balls:

@xd.Balls: Hmm, I guess you never noticed those things they call 'Nielson ratings' that are published all over the place.

@xd.Balls: 99%?!?

@gnomeholes: It's like the article come to life!:

@clickmyface: I want passion but not fanboyism.

The problem with fanboys is that it often becomes such a part of their identity (e.g., 'Apple person', 'Linux person', etc), they will react to criticism of the product as if it were criticism of their 'self'.

@bobbobato - giz's other gay dude: "Hacking, massive traffic jams, rampant pirating, cheap knock offs, scalping."

@noamjamski: I have looked at that size by size comparison and it exactly matches what I have shown: The Evo is only slightly bigger than the Nexus one.

(I grabbed four random shirts and used the smallest of the four measurements)

@noamjamski: If Evo is a "giant phone" and is only slightly bigger, that must mean a Nexus one is a very big phone. If a Evo sticks out of your pocket and is only .15" longer, that must mean that the Nexus One fills your pocket to that distance or less.

@noamjamski: "You don't care, giant phone or not (just telling people to get an EVO is a scary proposition if they don't realize they are basically getting a small tablet)"

@Brookespeed: Pretty much the way I have always looked at cell phones.

@A.Jaswal: "Fair enough, but these things were made to not fail. Its weird that a nuke just stops working. "

@MossyPosse: Oops. You are right. I thought they were the same (for software compatibility reasons) but they are not. iPhone is 1.5 to 1 but iPad is 1.33 to 1.

@MossyPosse: Only for movies. For everything else, it just shows more at the bottom.

@Joel C Bulo: Apple foolishly committed to a 1.5 to 1 screen because they were looking at the phone space more than the PDA space and now they are stuck. That's why for smartphones, the iPhones only use 52% of the viewing surface area for the screens but most others use 60-70%: they chose to go very squat.

@Settings:

@Settings: How would Facebook make money from it since it is not authorized by Facebook (they say it is complete fiction) and are no way involved in the production of it?

@zenpoet: "new and dangerous ways"