@vinod1978: You missed the point: an iPhone 3GS in a silicone case is thicker and wider in an EVO.

@LTMP: Did you read the article?

@LTMP: "If you view the whole antenna thing from the perspective that Jobs was correct, and the problem is common to most phones, what he's doing is pretty reasonable."

@bobbobato: "#1 and #4 are just stupid, because they really are true. "

@vinod1978: Do you consider the iPhone 3GS huge? The EVO is less than 4 mm wider and less than 1 mm thicker.

"what's an extra 20mm of thickness when you're already rocking one of the largest handsets out there?"

@slithers: " it has been 10 per day."

@Brandon Harris:

@NuevoLeon: It was kind of harsh but you seem to be missing the point: all phones suffer from attenuation if you cover them up in some way - that includes the iphone 4 - and constantly going back to talking about attenuation is just a distraction from the bridging problem.

@NuevoLeon: The keys are so shiny!

@NuevoLeon: Dropping BARS when covering the the phone with your hand is nowhere near the equivilant of dropping CALLS by touching a single spot.

@Brandon Harris: Oh, and the problem with the iPhone is not attenuation (something all phones will experience under the right circumstances) but that bridging the attennas will cause calls to drop. Those videos don't show that.

@MJDeviant: Actually the thing about art people being so into Apple that I always shake my head at is that they tend to think of themselves as nonconformists but are such conformists when it somes to Apple that they will openly mock people that don't conform.

@Ab1013227: Yeah, that is so lame for a software and OS company.

@AlphaJarmel: "Any idiot knows you don't get into a sniper fight with a guy who is more accurate and quicker than you. If you know you're handicapped then you try to minimize the damages such as close range where accuracy doesn't matter. If you have a shotgun in someone's face then it doesn't matter who is more…

@cc: [edit: never mind]

@brilang: Projectors from 2001 tended not to be able to display readable text that small (relative to the overall screen size) and still be readable. Also, rear projection has a linear drop in crispness the father off center you get from viewing and the screens at the sides of the picture look sharp even thought they…

@Tetsuooooooo: And the bezels are too small for CRTs.

I have my doubts about the original photo data indicating 2001 being correct as those are pretty darn big LCD screens for that era.

@ninjagin: "I can't imagine how black or Native Americans must feel when they look at my cracker-ass. "