estrode
estrode154
estrode

No, the rule says either kicking out the feet of an opponent or doing the upper body push, doesn’t need to be both.

I miss my bassett.

OK, have you ever played hockey? I’d suggest watching the video again. Acciari, was playing a puck that was wrapped around the boards. When he turns his back to play the puck out of the zone Bozak is at least 10 feet from him. I’d have zero complaints if Bozak had put a shoulder to him to knock him off the puck, but

I’m sorry, Acciari was in no way in the wrong place. He was actively playing the puck. And having your stick across the back of both legs and putting your knee into the back of another players knee is almost the definition of an egregious penalty. The number of penalties the Blues took vs the Bruins has no bearing on

Feel free to have a friend kick your leg out from under you while he’s moving at that speed and see how “manly” you fall. 

I’d suggest watching the play again, no Bruins player (with the exception of the guy who’d just gotten slew footed and hit his head on the ice) stopped playing.

So the player who was tripped and afterwards pulled for concussion protocol, should have immediately popped up and gotten back into the play? The B’s did keep playing. The goal was a little fluky as Krug blocked the puck which popped straight back to the Blues player. Rask got caught moving left to right (playing the

Never waste a $12 beer

Have you ever fallen backwards after having a leg kicked out from under you?

Sorry how can you possibly say that using your knee to hit the back of another players knee is not a trip? And for direction of travel are you saying if he’d smoked him in the middle of his back it wouldn’t have been a cross check because the Boston player was skating backwards?

OK let’s be honest, the hold on Krug and the trip on Kuraly were ridiculously egregious.  

Do you really think that any ref will call a penalty on a player leaving the bench to escort the trainer to a injured player?  Player safety, during a serious injury (the only kind the refs can immediately stop play for) trumps a myopic interpretation of this rule.

There are two ways to win a war. Have the best weapons, or have the most weapons. Not in all cases, but in a lot of cases the Germans had the technologically superior weapons systems. The Allies simply outproduced them.

I think they’re assuming that the ramp would hit the beach and the troops could storm off. Going over the side was slower, you had to wait for the guy in front to wade out of the way, and you’re jumping into deeper water, not stepping onto the beach.

There was definitely push to “just get stuff done” but also a lot of the bureaucracy that slows down projects, either didn’t exist or was incredibly streamlined.  Not sure if the Higgins plant was one of them, but I know some plants had military personnel responsible for design oversight sitting at the desk next to

Based on the video from NASA, the driving mechanism is a rotating weight. There is a rotating pine and the bottom of the weight is an spiral, so as the weight turns the bottom edge rides the pin, forcing the weight up. After a complete revolution, there is a slot in weight and the weight falls, impacting the inside of

Once you open the packaging, alcohol can be an outside the box solution. 

This is not how you delete your internet search history

While I don’t necessarily disagree with you, the design used is incredibly light, which is the limiting factor on probes.  I’d assume (hope) that this probe was field tested in materials that they felt were similar to the soils in this location. 

The way the “mole” is designed once it is released there is no mechanical connection between it and the housing, based on the explanation in the video.  I’m sure this was the lightest possible solution.  No specs were given but the weight in the mole looks extremely small, so not a lot of force per hit either. Totally