errantnight--disqus
errantnight
errantnight--disqus

You must do a lot of mansplaining.

Wait a minute…are you mansplaining the word "mansplaining" to us?! That's…that's some GRADE "A" trolling right there, sir. Well done. WELL DONE I say.

Dragula?

Poor storytelling because they're going to resurrect Jon because you don't like resurrection stories, or poor storytelling because they're going to cheat and not resurrect him after so heavily foreshadowing it and giving so much screen time to so many unresolved plot points, but not poor storytelling for the

None of the theories that suggest Jon will be back are contradicted by his factual death. We all saw him die. Think Jesus Christ, dude is getting resurrected.

Yeah, they probably spent all that time foreshadowing his resurrection and that of a prophesied hero and introducing various ways in which people could be brought back to life and then moving the various characters into position so that this character in particular would be resurrected only to say PSYCHE! JUST

Only if your sister/brother allows them to watch it. My kids are growing up on books and the animated Grinch Who Stole Christmas. By the time they're old enough to make decisions on their own about what to watch, watching decade+ old cheesy live action films aren't likely to be high on their list. The blip that is the

Sarah basically said, well, enough with establishing a consistent and clear method of determining the truth of the situation, back to the hemming and hawing that wasn't (and couldn't possibly) lead anywhere! Yeah, I have a feeling by the time all is said and done I'm going to feel underwhelmed by Serial for not taking

She's stated on their blog that we're not that far behind their investigation.

Only have to wonder for one more day, presumably.

I don't know that I agree. I love Serial, but I find myself constantly calling back to episodes of TAL and Radiolab where they talk about these very issues and banging my head against a wall about why they aren't being brought up, sooner. The unreliability of witnesses, institutional racism, how memory works, etc.,

This sort of genuine, un-ironic comment isn't appreciated 'round these here parts.

That is factually incorrect. Double stuf Oreos are for slack-assed Americans with sugar-bombed-out palates who appreciate only the steady, ever-widening of their pant sizes. Oreos, however, are pure perfection. Again, these are true facts of unquestionable authority. I just can't find my sources right now. But you can

Hey Guys! I'll be answering questions for the next half hour on:

Just out of curiosity, we're you driven to ad hominem troll accusations because:

Yeah, I'm definitely at fault for phrasing my original post horribly. It was poorly done and I have only myself to blame for any shot taken by anyone assuming I was talking about Mr. O'Neal.

You entirely missed the point. I was referring to the Hitfix article and the page views created not just by that article, but all of the subsequent media outlets who will regurgitate this click-driving bullshit everywhere.

I'm utterly at a loss to explain the correlation between the predetermined financial success of this film and the utterly outrageous and ridiculous claims made on Hitfix propagated everywhere throughout the internet-going world today for being click-bait ready. The original author, who knows something about films,

How many clicks has this hack generated by this obviously bullshit story? Millions? Billiions? I fucking hate the internet sometimes.

Fair enough, I could have walked that back a bit myself. So if/when you have the time/interest, i'm certainly interested into what some of the specific threads/characters are that you think don't need to be there. Cheers