ericzxvc
ericzxvc
ericzxvc

I don't care if it's a joke, what the hell is the point of posting this?? Nobody finds a joke about company copying Apple funny after one just got sued for 1 billion dollars, nobody wants to hear moronic Apple trolls talking about how MS stole their logo from Apple. This is just literally the biggest faux pas ever,

If people want apples you give them apples, if all of a sudden people want oranges you don't keep on selling apples, you go and sell oranges. This is the same thing that happened with Samsung, the market changed and Samsung changed to cater to the market like any company would, blackberry kept doing the same thing and

The old one was the best, the new one was bad compared to the old one, and this one is just fucking terrible. I don't feel like anybody is going to read my comments based on this system, it's just this huge clusterfuck that's hard to navigate and has no clear start and end points.

I can see all your listed reasons for why you think that, oh wait you have none. No adult in their right mind should ever dismiss something without considering the other's opinion, which you obviously just did. You are either a falsely entitled 12-year-old, or are a semi-disabled adult who never learned how to

I'm thinking about it, and I can't think of any. Even if you did save a life, you would be ending another, which wouldn't improve the situation at all.

From what I gather from my numerous friends with smashed iPhone screens (it's actually ridiculous how many people I know who use/used a smashed iPhone), the screen works perfectly fine when broken. Now that the touch sensors are fused with the glass, won't the screen not work after you smash it?

The problem here is that despite the fact that Apple lost the case against Microsoft you still take it as if Microsoft copied, and use it as an example in how it doesn't hinder innovation. If you want to use an example to prove your point you can't use one that was proven to have not copied. Also stating, "aggressive

>buy media

If it's so in the future that it's "one day" then it makes the need to put iPhone in the title even more extraneous.

Even if you meant, "what's in store", then it would also be untrue. For I find it unlikely that the 7th gen iPhone will use a 11 month old sensor. However a December Android/WP on the other hand...

I'm not overly defensive, I'm just annoyed at the fact that every time I read an article instead of seeing phone or tablet, I see iPhone or iPad. It alienates some of the readers and is completely unnecessary. If there were a respectable reason it would be understandable, but otherwise it just violates what I look for

The issue is that the title is misleading, it's not just an "oh OK, it doesn't matter" sort of thing, the title is implying that the only phone with this sensor is the iPhone. Your argument that it's "what's in stores" really falls through the cracks, there are phones in stores, I can buy phones and I'd rather know

I'm really interested in whether Gizmodo using "iPhone" or "iPad" synonymously with the word phone or tablet is because they're trying to troll us or are really that blindly apple-centric. Either way, it pisses off the readers and the only reason I can discern is the petty fanboyism that until now I thought was

The mouse button click on a track pad is a nice thing that really has no function. Normally tactile feedback is beneficial for two reasons, to know where your finger(s) is/are, and to tell you that it registered the click. Both of these reasons are unnecessary for a track pad: You don't need to know where you fingers

Did you miss the part where I said that you can put your opinion in your article? The point you are highlighting does not mean what you think it means; to withhold a controversial opinion for the interest of your readers is not relative withholding all opinions. If your opinion is generally accepted as incorrect and

First off I do not have any female bias or sexism towards women in tech. But your reasoning that a woman at home is around a ton of technology is very illogical. This site is about computers, phones and sometimes other tech things, and objectively evaluating them- not just using them. Telling me that somebody using a

It said that the venom is sensitive to a certain threshold of heat, and I'd rather not go around burning myself to find that threshold, and even if I did find it I wouldn't be able to replicate it. They said it can get painful, not that the pain is necessary; besides it's momentary as opposed to lasting itching, and I

Ok, we all know you're talking out of your ass when you tell us that the iPhone comes remotely close to the razr maxx. I don't know where you get the idea that the iPhone beats all Android handsets anyway, that's not true.

Here comes the next generation of the awful resolution of 1366x768, we were just starting to get laptops that stopped using it... is 1080p too much to ask? Or even 1600x900.

Almost definitely a typo, you can do 1080p video with a 2MP camera; that's why companies don't go any higher for front cameras.