Your grasp of the English language is aparently too weak to realize that I NEVER said “thermal imaging could help keep a REACTOR from ‘going boom.’” The various incorrect meanings that youve been arguing against are wholly the creation of your own mind, I’m not at all responsible for your poor grasp of the English…

You can repeat those narrow conclusions of yours as much as you want, they won’t magically turn into an actual argument that I’m wrong. Just because you said something stupid and dont want to admit it doesnt mean you need to keep repeating it rather than either admitting you’re wrong or slinking off.

I should have known that you would struggle to comprehend the obvious. I’ll try to break it down for you;

Exactly!

That would be an excellent argument if individual nuclear reactors were the entirety of a nuclear power plants. Spoiler: They’re not!

Merely posting conclusions rather than providing any basis for those conclusions is a really stupid way to try to have a discussion or win an argument. It forces me to guess at your rationale and just plain makes you look unintelligent.

At no point have I ever said that it “did something to prevent a boom” I’ve stated from my first post to the explanation that I keep posting for you that they help prevent explosions FROM DESTROYING NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS. I've pointed this out to you a few times now, but you seem to find that distinction to be…

Are you aware that the final sentence of your post agrees with my claim that containment structures play in preventing steam explosions from destroying nuclear power plants? You keep posting shit like “They do nothing to prevent explosions” as if my claim isn't about what they prevent steam explosions FROM DOING.

If you have an actual argument for why you think my explanation of their role is wrong, feel free to provide it. Ignoring it doesnt make it go away or mean that it’s wrong. Here it is, yet again;

Are you seriously asking me to explain why explosions make a booming noise? No wonder my original post didn’t make sense to you.

You should consult a primer on ad hominems, that post was based on your declaration that my response didn’t make any sense. “You must be confused because you dont think what I wrote makes sense” is not ad hominem, ad hominem is more along the lines of, “Your argument doesn’t make sense BECAUSE you’re confused.”

If you want answers to everything that you just brought up, please reread this thread. I would further invite you to learn what the phrase ad hominem means, it doesn’t describe derisive comments about what you’ve written.

I highly doubt that it took you much effort to act this stupid. The idea that talking about nuclear reactors “going boom” doesn’t make sense when both the worst and the most recent nuclear meltdowns both featured explosions is just plain fucking stupid. Three Mile NOT going boom because of the controlled release that…

They become a factor every time you say something stupid about nuclear safety, so hopefully it’ll be less of a factor when you post in the future. I don’t give a shit whether you doubt the explanation I gave you, but in the future you should try to avoid claiming something doesnt make sense just because you dont know…

I think you’re confusing relevance with agreeableness. The idea that articles on containment structures and nuclear meltdowns aren’t relevant to the your flawed theories about nuclear safety is batshit crazy - regardless of how often they contain knowledge that you dont seem to have.

You DESPERATELY need to either read the links I gave you or talk to those experts you supposedly have access to. In the case of Three Mile the containment vessel allowed for a controlled release of radioactive gasses rather than an explosion - sealing in the gas until the pressure exceeded the design limits would have…

Containing steam strikes me as an excellent way to prevent steam explosions from demolishing a nuclear power plant, as I’ve pointed out to you before. Perhaps if you were better able to comprehend and remember what I’ve written I would lend more credence to your feelings.

Now I’m just seriously concerned about you. I’ve explictly and implicitly answered that question for you about half a dozen times and explained the specific way in which thermal cameras can help prevent steam explosions twice now. One more time, please feel free to take your time;

Why are you still trying to figure out “what kind of boom” I was referencing after I explictly told you the answer? My neurologist suggestion was because you were asking a question despite the answer being VERY recently provided to you, which suggests that you’re experiencing major problems retaining information.

Why on earth would elaborating on my initial statement and providing you the specifics of my original claim require me to make a trip to a neurologist? Perhaps your reading comprehension difficulties are cropping up again and you merely need to spend more time comparing those two quotes.