The Haas/Ferrari agreement was just extended to the end of 2028. If Toyota decided to join, it would likely take them 2-3 years to even have a viable engine. So I don’t think the Ferrari contract is great proof against this.
The Haas/Ferrari agreement was just extended to the end of 2028. If Toyota decided to join, it would likely take them 2-3 years to even have a viable engine. So I don’t think the Ferrari contract is great proof against this.
You hear that!? If you’ve got a truck, you better want to beat it up!
Now fit four, without any additional accessories.
Pouch cells are all the rage on consumer cordless power tools, and those are damn impressive.
Lithium isn’t the defining characteristic for solid state batteries; it’s the lack of a liquid and/or gel electrolyte. It’s called “solid state” because the electrolyte is solid. Lithium can be in both of them, but lithium typically in solid state batteries is metallic lithium not a lithium-ion or lithium polymer.
Reports from actual papers (like Bild) don’t make it seem like Cameron was attempting to be a hero at all. He was stabbed at his freakin’ front door, and the reports suggest he was stabbed almost immediately after opening the door.
Whooosh.
They were busy using the nameplate(s) for their Bronco competitor on two completely forgettable CUVs.
It was probably still in drive too. So she was fighting the fuckin’ engine.
I’ve got a few minor issues with it, but overall think it’s a good idea.
I’m honestly surprised something like the Envoy XUV hasn’t made a comeback as a fullsize SUV/truck.
While Lucid cars are great, I’m not sure their Saudi backing makes them a morally better company.
No Saab 9-4x on the list? I’m surprised.
I’ve been riding for a decade; the number of times I’ve really really wanted is like once or twice. That was on my FIL’s Harley Heritage .
Strong disagree. While oil companies (or whatever industry you want to pick) has a “Carbon Footprint” millions of times higher than Swift, it doesn’t negate that Swift herself doesn’t have a carbon footprint hundreds, thousands or even millions of times higher than a typical person.
Ehhh, I disagree. Is it even worse as a production vehicle? Yes. But if Tesla had released some concept exactly like this (while also releasing a far more reasonable production truck that wasn’t like the Cybertruck) it would have been way better.
First, do they not realize the side windows don’t matter nearly as much as the pilot’s windows?
This is why I try to do most of my riding on divided bike lanes and separated trails/paths. I often feel stupid loading up my car with my bicycle to drive ~3 miles to the bike path where I’ll then ride for ~30 miles, but there simply isn’t enough safe bike infrastructure to get me there during high traffic times.
I don’t doubt the validity that allowing blacks to buy their vehicles helped save Cadillac, I’m simply suggesting that there are claims made in this piece (as well as the original) that aren’t actually backed up with any proof. That’s not exactly great journalism.
I could see these being awesome in relatively narrow use cases; things like parking garages. Outside in most of America (well, the world really) it seems like the elements would really shorten the life of these. Add in snow plow risks in ~half the US and suddenly these don’t seem great.