In 2013 I bought a new Xterra Pro4X. Within a few weeks I noticed there was a small leak coming from what I assumed was the OEM roof rack. I took it to the dealer and they said they couldn’t re-create it. It kept leaking. I do the bare minimum investigation and see the grommet to the factor lights on the roof rack is…

The Supercharging network ain’t going anywhere any time soon. While yes, I think it was incredibly foolish for the team to be let go, but the headstart the network has over all other charging in the US, it’s ridiculous.

Tesla has a way longer runway than Fisker ever did. Plus, Tesla (or it’s assets) would likely get gobbled up by a competitor on their way down.

To be a tiny bit fair, the lower end cars—especially the ones eligible for the tax incentives—are super competitive price offerings for a lot of gas alternatives or hybrid cars. If you are swinging for an environmental daily driver, a Model 3 or Y ain’t exactly a bad choice.

“I’m very pleased.”

But it’s ok to assume they’ve “slipped thru”?

When your entire argument is about fair enforcement of the rules, showing perceived examples of unfair enforcement isn’t whataboutism.

If that’s the case, the BMV should simply say, “Thanks for making us aware, we are revoking those too.” but it doesn’t say anything like that has happened, thus it’s not exactly ridiculous to assume that those plates are still out there despite being brought to the BMV’s attention. So... not whataboutism at all.

Wonser and his lawyer are playing the whataboutism card essentially saying the Bureau picks and chooses what plates it what’s to approve. His suit points to examples of vanity plate phrase approvals like “FDT” and “FU TRMP.”

Give America yellow, you dumb fucks.

I generally find the Tesla reporting here to be a bit one sided, but them going to LIDAR after years of saying it wasn’t necessary, is actually pretty newsworthy.

BMW says the F900GS is a successor to the outgoing F850

Not really, since Blackstock implies the previous commenter is specifically targeting wealthy women. The commenter is specifically targeting wealthy people and thus implies they’d be entirely ok if male racers faced similar comments.

It’s not the ugliest vehicle ever made, but it’s certainly uglier than nearly every other vehicle that occupies this segment.

Subaru’s infotainment systems have been laggy garbage for over a decade. I’ve got a ‘18 Outback and the infotainment is slow as fuck and garbage. Heck, it won’t even consistently run Android Auto and for some reason is extremely picky on what cable I use to connect my phone.

Not that I agree with the previous commenter, but you aren’t accurately surmising their argument.

Even then I’m not ready to write these off entirely.

I’m normally on the ACAB side, but I’m really struggling to be displeased with what the cop did here.

It’s not off topic. You stated that it has to meet FMVSS to be a suitable automotive safety device. That’s factually incorrect.