It's kinda funny how C&D rate the WRX/STI 4th and 5th for "sport compact", respectively.

Well, aluminum will corrode. Corrosion is colloquially known as "rusting," though that isn't the correct term.

The Golf R is a far nicer place to be for 26,000 miles/year. Quieter, more comfortable, and just a more pleasant place to spend such a large amount of time. Add in fuel consumption, and I'd be saving roughly $450/year as well.

I'd like to have the flinch and the de-scope.

Not so much stroking the dash, but slamming the door shut and having to sit in a vehicle every day for ~70 miles. Oh, and not looking like I'm 19.

- Chris Perkins

No artist renderings yet?

Should ever? What if I'm borrowing the vehicle?

Let me put it this way. You own whatever vehicle you like. Would you want to borrow someone elses Camaro or Corvette?

I didn't realize that I have to actually hit and kill someone to realize how bad that is and how wrong it is to leave.

Do people think that just because a company goes bankrupt, that it ceases to exist? In some cases that is true. In most cases the pieces get bought up by other companies and the world keeps turning.

I need to get practicing.

If that is true, their "Value" metric is still way off base. How in the world does a Porsche 918 get a 8/10 for value while a Aston Martin that is 1/10th the price, gets a 9/10. It's just crazy. The interior or the Aston Martin is just as nice, to 99% of the population, they are both as stunning and exotic, they…

Not if no one can afford them. The best cars are the ones that can actually be driven by people.

The front end reminds me of a European spec. Saab 99.

What is this fella right here?

I have to waste my time addressing stupid comments.

You've found stuff worth reading here?

If it's an absolute scale, and the 918 gets a 9/10 on Value, then the WRX must get 90/10 on Value, at least.

How about an actual scale that makes sense?