+1 Prynne
+1 Prynne
It’s also UCLA’s colors, too. Expect a new version with SC, the Kings, Ducks, Angels, Galaxy, and anyone else’s colors they can think of..
Just need USC colors, Kings Colors, Angels Colors... who else? Oh Galaxy colors - their stadium partner. Ducks, LA KISS, hmm.. Lakers too... Oh yeah, and the Clippers.. marketing opportunities abound!
At first glance I thought that was a “B”. I had to click-and-zoom. Either way, though...
I’m not against eating a pizza while its still frozen. Celeste Pizza-for-Ones were good for this.
I see the logo but not sure if you’re from SD, but sorry for the loss. I’m a Broncos fan but love the city of SD... much nicer place to hang out than LA. I grew up with Chuck Muncie and Dan Fouts just down the freeway 100+ miles in a much better location for a fan than the team will be in now.
Double-click: Microsoft Paint
Which, in a brilliant act of synergy, is the same level of effort and dedication that went into winning games.
On LA sportstalk this morning I heard they’ll be expanding the seating to 32,000, so about what the Chargers drew in San Diego.. Hey-ooo!!!
He’s in Chatsworth as we type.
I get the point but it’s not exactly apples-to-oranges. As a fan we don’t watch the games to see how much money our favorite player is earning. We want to see our favorite team win. For every Joe Flacco getting as much money as he can with a big contract, that reduces (though not eliminates) the team’s chances of…
It always feels like attendance figures for any team or stadium that doesn’t regularly sellout are exaggerated a bit.
This seems so true, especially the misplaying a hand part.
A 93,000 seat stadium looks pretty empty with 70,000 people in it. Unless I’m reading Pro Football Reference’s stats wrong (and I may be as these numbers are pretty surprising to me), the Rams were 4th in Total Attendance, 2nd in Home Attendance. No single week’s attendance was lower than 55,000, and only two weeks…
The Rams were not only a losing team but they didn’t even put points on the board. But the 90s aren’t the 20-teens. Predicting failure based on metrics that are 25 years old is shortsighted unless all the other variables are exactly the same, and they absolutely are not. The league itself is vastly superior to what…
I’m wishy-washy on former coaches, if they’re known by those interacting with them as coaches.
Havasu jet ski trip with his godfather Ced.
Anytime during his starting career that he hasn’t played a minute, what’s their winning percentage in those games? Pretty good.
The guy who’s team routinely plays the same playoff-caliber ball with or without him? Yeah. That guy. But your bias is built-in to your name so don’t even pretend to be objective. You’ll be forgiven for it... by someone.
All the more reason he deserves MVP cred. An mvp’s team should be debilitated without him.