emperornorton
EmperorNorton
emperornorton

how about some way of collecting the liquid in the bag? Maybe an upside down plastic cup with a hole poked?

False. :)

I really disagree with this. With finite resources (mainly time), we need to be careful how we allocate. Putting the same effort into taking out the garb as you do to performing brain surgery is a mistake, in my opinion.

A simile is like a metaphor.

Has this even been out for 100 hours? Get some sleep, man! I don't want to read about you being the next version of that kid in South Korea!

Where's the head? Forget it.

Why would time travel would involve decoupling from the planet's gravity? I'm traveling forward in time right now and I'm quite securely stuck to the Earth. What hypothetical factor in this hypothetical scenario would undo that? Particularly if you're looking at time "travel" rather than some sort of time

So basically you want us to work for you for free? Pass.

Perhaps this is related to why talking on a cell phone is (apparently) more distracting than talking to a passenger?

If I had to guess, I'd say there was a concentration gradient that they follow the same way we follow where a smell is coming from.

Some of us would kill to look like that bottom cartridge.

Did they get 100 every time they ripped off a face?

Except that the original meaning of the term meant a progressive change, so once again scientists have chosen a term that already had a meaning different from the one they were trying to convey and are now pouting over people not allowing them to change the existing definition. Just like they do with the word

I got distracted as well, sorry. I actually meant to post what I was thinking but one link led to another... I wouldn't consider it brave since my identity is fairly well hidden here. I could admit to being a Brony here without fear of embarrassment. (I'm not, though, honestly. I tried it once but I didn't inhale.)

Wow! Nothing to be sorry for; thank you for your patience and hard work explaining all that in detail. I didn't find the succinct answer nearly as satisfying. The mere fact that you put so much effort into the explanation makes me feel better about the whole thing even before reading it.
Here's the "full disclosure" on

James, sorry, but you're completely and totally wrong. There doesn't appear to be any way to make it clearer to you, so I'm bowing out here.

And there it is.

Well, I read this article. I don't know what you read. Several of these have statements along the lines of "We know better," which I just pulled from the one about theory. You've got the point of the article exactly backwards. It suggests that there is a 'one true meaning' to these words, and that's completely absurd.

Thank you for being much more concise. This is perfect.

People will even answer honestly for a dating site? I find that hard to believe. I've known at least one actual sociopath, and even he understood the idea of telling people what they want to hear, even if he didn't care about their feelings beyond the point of using them to get what he wanted. It worries me that