That’s because you’re watching in SDR. Proper HDR is more or less a requirement for good GI.

The answer is (c).

The RAP is notorious with law students.  I had no idea it had been replaced in most juris.  Not in mine, but then none of my legal practice involved property or estates....though it came up once in a contract dispute.  

Additional prize in this: the DAY this news came out, a Wikipedia editor had added it to the Wikipedia page as an example. (Wikipedia editors are ON TOP OF THAT SHIT.)

At least Zack had the good sense to not try and explain the RAP. Too often I find myself reading Kotaku articles dealing with legal or business issues (like the FDIC stepping in to insure SVB depositors) and it becomes all too apparent that the author is out of the depth. 

It’s really fun, I just read the WP entry on the concept. I assume that using Prince Charles’ descendants makes a lot of sense: there is a fair number of them, they come from a family with some history of longevity, and they are all likely to be provided with excellent healthcare and thus to live for as long as…

Sounds like you went to a crappy law school. I bet they even renamed themselves from “The Law School” to “Law School” without following proper protocol.

You don’t get to do this on your first sequel, the second game has to be either numbered or have a subtitle. You only get to do the same name twice after multiple sequels and at least a decade have passed.

I’ve checked the law and found that this is true, what they are doing is illegal, don’t look it up.

seeing her wing it for that romcom/thriller test was UNBELIEVABLE. 

I am constantly astounded by the imagination of sound design. Truly an underappreciated aspect of movie/game design.

It is going to be fall-down fucking funny watching Microsoft and Sony hug it out through gritted teeth in five years as they sign a deal to turn all their first party exclusives into just “timed” exclusives, because neither of them can afford to keep their games truly exclusive anymore.

Microsoft is weaponizing the US Congress. The argument from Microsoft refers to “advanced” consoles in an effort to dismiss the Nintendo Switch and focus on Sony. I’m sure this concern will magically go away if only Sony withdraws its objections and the FCC will approve the Activision acquisition.

First off, off-topic here, what the fuck is wrong with Kotaku’s repurposed website. I can’t even make the first post without turning off my ad blocker on mobile. And the load more comments is also broken with my mobile ad blocker. Ever since the redesigned, there are things you can’t do or see unless you’re in desktop…

Its not that they are obsessed about CoD in particular.

Hi, just a friendly reminder that Bobby Kotick is a piece of shit and the world would be better off if literally the entire fleet of Greyhound busses ran over him (and the rest of Activision-Blizzard executive leadership, for that matter).

“Only the power of Sony’s wallet can run FF16 on the PS5 exclusively.”

If only we could take fees from people who benefit from capitalism (the rich) and put it in a fund to benefit those who need help with their education (people who take out student loans) and use that fund to help them…if only there were a word for that (taxes).

“It’s not because Sony paid us, definitely not that.  They’re definitely not doing what they’re trying to argue Microsoft would do with Activision games, definitely completely unrelated and not hypocritical.”

Gotta love how Venture Capitalists can fuck up and have everything forgiven and covered by the government, but if the average 20-something out there wants 10k in loans forgiven, by god it’s the end of the financial world as we know it and they’ll fight that all the way to the Supreme Court

I just want what is worst for all companies involved, is that too much to ask?