I think I would really like it if a band of relevant celebrities got together and made a series of sex ed videos, which they would then advertise online and on TV. If obstinate fossils are going to stop kids from becoming functioning and happy humans, give them a pleasing alternative the laziest of them has heard of.
One man told KWES, “I mean I have a kid, honestly I don’t want my kid growing up in an area where nasty stuff like that happens.”
Yeah, reading about Alfonso is sometimes like...how dumb can you be?
Yes, Elizabeth being Queen would have meant both her uncle having no legitimate children and her father having no legitimate sons (and they were respectively age 31 and 30 when she was born) and that would have seemed incredibly unlikely.
I don’t know!! I am so afraid that the show will just peter out enigmatically. And that Don will keep on making shite decisions. No one cares about Diane! I would prefer an episode that was entirely comprised of conversations between baby Gene and Glen to having a single additional second devoted to her pointless…
It’s certainly and interesting coincidence...
Hemophilia is one of the reasons European monarchies died out and/ or allowed royals to marry commoners. Their gene pools were too shallow, so to speak.
That and the roller skating while Roger played the organ.
Of course. At that time, since Independence actually, New York and the Eastern seaboard was a bastion of WASP pretensions towards and about the English. They unironically called themselves “cousins” to the Brits. Something most clearly seen in how FDR went way out of his way to help them before American involvement in…
I have to assume that Mexico, et al (“Latin America”) goes as nuts for the Borbons as we do the Windsors.
No?
I loved Roger originally thinking that Shirley was leaving because “we all hate Carol”.
There has been more then enough out-breeding over the last few generation for royal family to not qualify as inbreed . They were inbreed when the royal family of Europe used to marry each other. But they don’t do that anymore.
I am interested in royal babies, along with many other subjects, both trivial and important. Anyone who believes squealing over a cutely-dressed child precludes knowledge of, or interest in, important issues can sod off.
You cite the Reading EAGLE! I LOVE reading these old newspapers from my home county. For anyone who clicks on the link, check out the previous page of “Personal Mentions.” Essentially, if you went out of town, you told the town newspaper where you’d be and how long.
And why wouldn’t the world be concerned with generations of inbreeding to preserve a genetic line?
I was about 4 when princess Dianna died and I had no idea who she was but it affected me pretty strongly as it was my first experience of grief. I became obsessed- I would cut out pictures of her and watch documentaries on her and ask my parents about her.
I couldn’t care less how long the term “royal baby” has been used. I want to know what type of witchcraft Kate is practicing so that eight hours after she has a baby she looks like this
I always find it hilarious that people inevitably get so upset at the interest in the royal family. They’re rich, powerful, and live the kind of life that seems like a time warp. What’s not interesting about that? Also, babies are cute! Sorry not sorry that I’m sitting here constantly refreshing What Kate Wore so I…