emerald7
Rachel at Cardholder Services
emerald7

And, of course, she is so upright and honorable, she will keep her word, even when the cameras and the self-serving politicians melt away and the lack of publicity and affirmation sets in. Right?

What happens now? Does she go back to her office, bully the clerks into not issuing any more licenses, and the whole things starts over again, like some weird hypocritical fundy Groundhog Day?

Oh Papa Tooney. We’ve got a Looney!

The only good thing I’ve seen to come out of this so far is that in all the still photos, I haven’t seen a single person in the crowd using their cell phones to take pictures. People actually did seem to have a sense of propriety. That’s very rare these days.

Forget it, Jake. It’s the internet.

Betraying a public trust by using your server? Get real. Find me something that is seriously a betrayal of trust or get over it. By the way, wasn’t it the latest Bush incarnation that used private email for everybody in his regime during his term as governor? I guess that’s okay with you since he’s a Republican though.

The way things have been going regarding emails and government lately, her server was probably the only one in the government that wasn’t hacked. So I don’t see what the big fuss is about.

I have a life. It doesn’t involve you. And I will not spend another minute of it on you. I have a novel to finish writing. Find somebody else to spout your obsessions to.

You won’t go after Fox for attacking Clinton, but you are more than happy to go after Jezebel because ....why? You think you can bully them into backing off of light-hearted comments on appearance? That makes you a hypocrite.

Let’s see here...you go from criticizing an article a publication posted to deciding I’m the problem and throwing a pissy fit that I’m not following your rules of debate. Perhaps you should read your chart again yourself. So, to return to the original point: when you show me some of the comments you have made

Well if you want to see publications with more tact, perhaps you should quit posting. That would up the standard.

Definitely. I mean it’s not as though male-centered publications would ever judge any woman by how she looks and how much she spends on grooming. That would be totally unheard of. Right?

Where is the camera that took that pic? I am curious as to how it would record audio of what sounds like the wind but not of the plane engines...

How does that work if you are disabled and can’t squat — say a fractured knee cap or arthritis or a broken leg in a cast for instance?

Yes, there is something more annoying, Disney’s “It’s a Small World” A friend was once trapped on a ride at DisneyWorld for nearly an hour due to mechanical malfunction. Unfortunately the malfunction didn’t include the music and he had to listen to that the entire time. Now, whenever he hears it, he goes nearly

Why exactly would anybody want to land a helicopter in a minefield?

I’d say make a lot of witty and intelligent comments, but it hasn’t worked for me. Perhaps we can unionize and do some collective bargaining with them. Or maybe they have a quota system in place like Harvard? They only want a certain percentage of highly intelligent and witty people, so they have room for the less

“A fairly comprehensive list”? Not hardly. You forgot:

Kristin Cavallari
Mayim Bialik
Robert Kennedy Jr.
Toni Braxton
Tish Campbell-Martin

I wonder why Kristin Cavallari is getting a pass on this. Is it because she pays Defamer to post an article about her every day?

And given Bristol Palin first dibs on the rejects.