That’s not true at all. Someone might be all-in for a revolution, and then when it starts killing political prisoners and dissidents find the revolution not what they hoped to be. Conversely someone (especially someone living in Paris) might not have an entirely accurate understanding of what a movement is about (a…

or maybe someone says they stand against those groups while still being a proponent of equality because they feel those groups don’t really practice what they preach. wouldn’t be hard to show all the vile things BLM did and takes credit for doing or examples of feminists holding ideological purity tests against other…

Oh look, another “holier than thou” who thinks anyone who disagrees with them is a bad person. Let me show just you how wrong you are:

“Egalitarianism - Relating to or believing in the principle that all people are equal and deserve equal rights and opportunities.”

Sounds discriminatory alright...

BLM isn’t even close to a group promoting equal rights. You’re dreaming.

In what universe is feminism or BLM about equality? They’re about advancement of their own constituents and nothing more or less.

“Whenever somebody says they are against something promoting equality”

Neo-feminism is not about equality. Women already have that. Neo-feminism is about the destruction of masculinity. If it’s masculine then it is evil. I cannot subscribe to this ideology.

You can judge all of that through some tweets huh?

Do you also have a psychic hotline?

I’d really like the age of looking to video game developers to be our priestly guidance counselors to end. Are video game players that desperate for parental figures or something?

Yeah but those hypocritical advertisers have no problem running ads with far worse in the comments or on super sketchy “children’s” videos. It’s always the ones who try and pretend to be the most virtuous that are the worst. Like all these idiots whining about “hate speech”.

All those brands are hypocrites. They didn’t care about running their ads on YouTube for years with far worse content in the comments. Even now they couldn’t care less about the written content on YouTube, they only virtue signaled when a few videos were reported in a major publication.

Yes, yes, we all know Gizmodo and its fellow Univison mouthpieces hate free speech. No need to constantly remind everyone.

Yeah, because <censored> free speech.

Unfortunately, few people understand that distinction - although that’s because they don’t believe in free speech being anything offensive, at all, and would be happy to see government regulate all of it.

Do you consider Facebook primarily a news site?

Free Speech is giving minority opinions the same access to infrastructure and audience that the majority has, even if that infrastructure is privately owned.