I agree completely. In five decades I’ve owned 30+ motorcycles, including Ducati, Honda, Kawasaki,Buell, Harleys, BMWs, Triumphs, BSAs . I currently have 5 but the best of all time is my KLR.
I agree completely. In five decades I’ve owned 30+ motorcycles, including Ducati, Honda, Kawasaki,Buell, Harleys, BMWs, Triumphs, BSAs . I currently have 5 but the best of all time is my KLR.
I think Trump is more of a ‘piece grabber’ than a peace keeper.
Nah, due to the fact your original comment featured no logic or information beyond your befuddled malapropism I dropped down on one knee to reach your level. The original post that reveals evidence that our new President wants to parade around like some kind of third world strongman or totalitarian military dictator…
Or perhaps a proxy war between Serbia and Kosovo?
Clinton was impeached. Impeachment is a trial. What they failed to do was convict Bill Clinton of any crime.
Nixon wasn’t impeached, “Impeachment≠removal”.
Uh-oh! I made the brain damaged drunk angry.
Did you mean drivel ?
The semantic distinction you are making doesn’t diminish the pointed interference by Russia of our democracy or The President’s public request for these actions. There is a difference between negotiating with an adversary and conspiring with one. The question of which Trump intends to engage in is still open at this…
As much as I disdane the gathering kleptocracy we’re now witnessing I have hope that you are correct. I seriously suspect that our new new President may never fully understand what the adults in his administration are up to. Nor is he likely to care as long as they can keep him titillated with rallys full of fawning…
I’m not impressed by some drunk Russian toddling around some superstructure when I can see Americans in wing suits swooping past them causing them to stagger.
Any one who is ignorant of the fundamental policy differences between President Clinton and President Bush deserves life under President Trump. I suppose that’s how we got where we are today.
This is bound to be enlightening.
We’re not talking super bike levels of power here. I’m sure the same configuration could be achieved using the lower efficiency of chain drive but such an arrangement would be heavier, dirtier, noisier and more expensive to manufacture. I’m not sure why you would suggest it.
Yeah, I don’t know who wrote that caption but it’s the only obtuse/unexplained element in an otherwise outstanding article.
I’ll loan you the drive belt from my 140 hp Harley.
Not a dead end...An offramp!
Live long and prosper!