on the plus side, they’d be much less likely to come over asking for a cup of sugar or some other nonsense.

I’m going to click just so I can make this super original jo-DAMMIT!!!!!!!!!!!!

oh, I’m with you 100%.  I’m just thinking it’s fair to say that if you liked DC you’re apt to like AS and if not, then no.

The graphic says “Note: Total deaths include ideologically and non-ideologically motivated killings”.

of course.... but is that a compliment?

A savage hypocrisy

I’m going to sit here a moment and savor the alliteration... mmmmmmmm......

It has to be a place that takes barbeque seriously enough to order 20 pounds of it but not so seriously that it’s impossible they’d leave it behind.

Is there a second gif with which to compare the two definitions?

there’s no way this comment is going to get the love it deserves buried deep in this thread. 

If my side salad comes on top of my spaghetti, can I send it back?

Scammers are targeting individuals willing to eat three Little Caesar’s pizzas? I thought we weren’t supposed to kick people when they’re down.

in a reverse fashion no less!

For some reason?   You do know all ads anymore are curated from your browsing history, right?

“Magnificent!”

I’m tucking that explanation away for later. Thanks!

Fair enough question, and thanks for the laugh.

“pro-male blog” isn’t exactly right... maybe “male tolerant”?

And to be clear, this comment isn’t terrible; it’s simply satire targeting the larger commentariat.

I Modestly Propose that we avoid the Catch-22 of not wanting to peel back The Onion by labeling satire as such but also not wanting to leave it ambiguous and watching the commentariat turn into a rabid Animal Farm. Lets just leave the satire to the satirists.