“The fan-favorite Star Trek: Voyager captain joins Paramount+’s CG animated series.”
“The fan-favorite Star Trek: Voyager captain joins Paramount+’s CG animated series.”
Do the WB execs realize that Black Canary is called that not because she is black? It would have been fine if they made Harley black or whatever, because her name is not associated with race, but this is just a weird choice. It’s like making a Yellow Lantern character Asian or casting a Native American as a Red…
It’s too clean and cliche. Blade Runner was revolutionary in part because it was an entire world that you felt was real and lived-in. When you came out of the theater or the movie room you were surprised that it wasn’t raining. It almost had a smell. This however looks very clean and stripped down - basic.
Good riddance. These last several seasons were a complete cluster. I suspect that the Whitaker can do better, but it’s hard to tell from the idiocy we’ve been getting instead. I don’t care if the new Doctor is a guy or a girl - doesn’t matter, as long as the stories are good, episodes are well written, and everything…
Pfff. I am pretty sure Picard himself cursed (although in French) in the first season of TNG.
This sounds like a less technical and more vague version of the DS9 Technical Manual. Could be interesting, but doesn’t seem to be anywhere near as good - at least from the two pages shown here. Some of the material likely repeats from the original book.
Unfortunately BBC rode Dr. Who into the ground, at least for now. If you look at the ratings, the number viewers for the show have been steadily dropping. My guess is that any decent spinoff right now would kill the original Dr. Who show by pulling away a large portion of the remaining fans.
So, will the question of who built the tracks and who maintains them ever be answered? What about why everybody is riding around in a train instead of sitting under ground in a bunker which should be much safer and more stable in many ways? What about train maintenance - moving parts break down surprisingly often, and…
I think that BBC now calculates ratings aggregate together with on-demand viewers over a period of two weeks. Here are the overnight viewers of the shows - they are pretty abysmal, and it sounds that this Christmas special has the lowest rating of all the specials so far (from what I heard from some reviewers at least…
My guess is that’s because Dr. Who itself is getting its lowest ratings in 20-30 years. It makes sense to create a spinoff from a successful show - but if the original show is already sucky then that’s just silly. The spinoff needs to use the original show as a platform or plank from which to jump off and start swimmin…
OK, so are we agreed on the fact that you are an asshole, since you are not disputing that and even keep insulting people left and right? Good, I am glad we are on the same page.
First of all, let’s suppose for a second that my argument is invalid. Does that mean that you have a right to be a total dick about it? Or perhaps you just like insulting people and are using this as an excuse to be a dick, which suggests that it is your nature to be an asshole?
LOL, no, you are a dick who insults people with zero information about them and without any provocation, and who is afraid to debate his positions honestly in a polite manner. That’s a very different thing from what you just described.
Possibly. And I know how you are going to respond. By waving away all my arguments and points as irrelevant and then insulting me. You’ve made it pretty clear what kind of person you are, and how you talk to people.
Well, you’ve successfully ran away from any conversation or debate by being a dick and insulting people left and right. [clap]....[clap]....[clap]
Your lack of arguments and points underlines the weakness of your position. At least you left out the ad hominem attack this time, although you hinted at it. You are progressing! Congratulations!
First of all, why are you using the word “textual”? I don’t think that word means what you think it means. textual: ADJECTIVE, relating to a text or texts.
Riiiiight. Your in-depth and extremely articulate points have convinced me. Your debating skill astounds me, and I feel that my entire position and indeed worldview has been shattered. I am undone.
LOL, yea, no, not so much. Either you have very little curiosity and low standards for worldbuilding, or you forgotten them. I suggest you go back and watch the movies again. So much is left dangling and so much context is missing it is ridiculous. Also, go watch ANH again as well. In just the first several scenes in…
Why are we not supposed to debate the issue? The whole point of this site - and indeed most/all fan sites - is to debate topics from various fandoms. This is still a point of contention.