I appreciate a good semantic discussion, actually (not to mention your dedication to living in to your Kinja handle). You’re not wrong, but I would argue that a lot of his references to “America” (“Make America Great Again” is the most obvious, but there are also numerous references to showing America’s strength,…

Maybe you’re right, but then again, maybe you’re not. And that’s not a risk that women, the LGBT community, people of color, and non-Christians should be willing to take.

...and someday you can look back and know that you did your part to stop an orange cloud of fascism from taking over your country, even if it wasn’t you who stood the most to lose.

“I focus on the prosecution of sexually violent predators, working to keep the most dangerous sex offenders in custody in mental hospitals,” he wrote in a 2002 biography.

“...on the DECISION of a girl...” (emphasis mine)

When I was a kid, hats were not allowed to be worn during the school day (public school, no real dress code). To my knowledge, this was a pretty standard rule. If KIDS THESE DAYS are allowed to wear hats in school, the school had it coming. Bring back the good old days when there were rules and children listened to…

How could Dan Turner allow this to be published with so many typos? Let me take a stab:

We all just need to take a leaf out of this guy’s book. Pure class.

Sushi and Indian are two of the quicker takeout options in NYC, in my experience. Chinese and Thai are generally the quickest. Pizza varies wildly. Fuck Atomic Wings.

So: Enforcing the Civil Rights Act = blatant overreach, but legislating which private space people use to pee = not blatant overreach. Right.

I’m fascinated by the dichotomy of “Cruz/Fiorina” vs. “Cruz/Carly.” Was it just done on certain products for spacing reasons? Referring to him (exclusively) by his last name and her (albeit sometimes) by her first name seems...infantilizing. So much for all those glass ceilings she shattered.

So if this WEREN’T an election year, Virginia Republicans would be cheering this move? Not buying it.

But...corporations are people, according to the Supreme Court re: Hobby Lobby. So, as a person, Target has the right to set their own policies, no? Or would it only apply to their employees, not their customers?

Not to mention that O’Connor and RBG had very different views. Isn’t it cool how two people can share a gender but see the world in different ways? Like, men and women both have this ability! Incredible.

Can someone make a face swap of these two? I feel like there wouldn’t be a huge difference.

And yet he outspent Hillary by huge margins in the New York, Pennsylvania, and others.

My state’s official state dog is the Great Dane, thank you very much.

In high school, some guys got the school receptionist to summon Jack Mehoff over the loudspeaker. Sincerest thanks for the trip down memory lane.

Honest question: Aren’t there cases where carrying a fetus “incompatible with life” can be harmful to the mother? Couldn’t forcing perinatal hospice care on such a woman be dangerous to her? Not that the GOP cares, but I feel like I’ve read about cases like this, and I’m curious as to how it would be handled.

I agree with the tax exemption part, but couldn’t one argue that college itself serves the purpose of creating that network social capital? Sports teams and other campus organizations, particularly the academic and political ones, also serve this purpose. Not that fraternities and sororities don’t, but they’re not the…