And that’s totally cool, because that’s what the comments are for. But not the articles. It’s subtle, I guess ;-)

What book is this, please?

Jman, you keep preachin’ it, and I’ll keep wavin’ my hands in the air like I just don’t care while I’m feelin the Gospel power of the Holy-Neal Adams-Denny O’Neil-Spirit.

Starred because there’s no negativity or snark in this article. Thank you.

His entire oeuvre disagrees with you.

I’ve never heard it said better than this. Everything I like and everything I despise about little Zacky in one damn sentence.

She’s totally in that shot. This book and movie are a sequel; the science backs it up.

Ah HA! I knew Leto was a fake-out!

What? No! Not like that! Jeez! Also- Station wagon? What station wa-

Hmmm... Interesting... Tell us more.

Excellent News!

Star-tastic! (But, if I star your splendid comment, and we’re both grey, dosn’t even count? Does anything even matter anymore!?!)

Well said. But, really, I’m gonna assume she doesn’t have an editor. If she did, she might not have been so quick to post such an outrageous, ignorant, self-absorbed comment.

Agreed.

Wow. What a thing to say.

Agreed! There was actually quite a lot of stuff I liked about Watchmen: The Movie. And in retrospect, it could have been a HELL of a lot worse.

I’m with ya. I love just about everything Desplat’s ever done (and lately, I probably listen to him more than Giacchino), but Michael’s been the heir apparent to Star Wars for a long time. Even John Williams himself has made some mild comments in that regard.

Excellent work, mate. A lot of folks don’t realize just how much of Barlowe’s work they’ve seen over the years.

I’d be totally okay with that. And the return of Patton Oswalt and his brothers.

In the “gig lifestyle”, busy is always good. Congrats!